Posted on 06/12/2014 11:49:07 AM PDT by Mozilla
In covering the killings in Las Vegas by Jerad and Amanda Miller this week, mainstream media commentators once again displayed their hypocrisy and double standard regarding Islamic terrorism and terror attacks that are supposedly right-wing.
CNNs national security analyst Peter Bergen wrote Tuesday the Millers appear to have been motivated by extreme far-right views. The couple left a flag at the scene of the crime with the words Dont Tread on Me, a Revolutionary War symbol used by some anti-government extremists.
Bergen went on to emphasize that countering violent extremism cannot simply be a demand placed on Muslim communities to prevent jihadist violence. In the decade since 9/11 right-wing extremists have demonstrated their ability to be just as deadly as their homegrown jihadist counterparts.
Yet while Bergen is ready to equate right-wing terrorists with jihadists, he is much less ready to examine the motivating ideology of the latter. While he readily ascribed the Millers murders to extreme far-right views, when writing in 2006 about the root causes of the 9/11 jihad attack, Bergen stated:
In the many discussions of the root causes of Islamist terrorism, Islam itself is rarely mentioned. But if you were to ask Bin Laden, he would say that his war is about the defence of Islam. We need not believe him but we should nevertheless listen to what our enemies are saying. Bin Laden bases justification of his war on a corpus of Muslim beliefs and he finds ammunition in the Koran to give his war Islamic legitimacy. He often invokes the sword verses of the Koran, which urge unprovoked attacks on infidels. Of course, that is a selective reading of the Koran and does not mean Islam is an inherently violent faith, but to believers the book is the word of God.
He has demonstrated no similar anxiousness to exonerate right-wing beliefs from responsibility for the violence supposedly committed because of them. And at the Daily Beast, Muslim comedian Dean Obeidallah went even farther in a piece entitled Home-Grown, Right-Wing Terrorism: The Hate the GOP Refuses to See. Obeidallah was certain that conservative views led to violence, and that that was why Republicans had ridiculed the idea of right-wing terrorism when the Obama Administrations Department of Homeland Security issued a warning about it in 2009. The actual reason Republicans wont investigate right-wing extremists, Obeidallah claimed, is that it would not only anger their base, it would actually indict some parts of it. Lets be honest: In a time when establishment Republicans are concerned about getting challenged in primaries by more conservative Tea Party types, calling for hearings to investigate right-wing organizations could be political suicide.
This is the same Dean Obeidallah who recently wrote this about the jihadists of Boko Haram, the Congregation of the People of the Sunnah for Dawah and Jihad: The Nigerian terrorist group that kidnapped hundreds of schoolgirls has nothing to do with Islam, and its grotesquely irresponsible of the media to suggest it does.
So an avowedly Islamic group that has repeatedly proclaimed that it is fighting in order to establish an Islamic state is not Islamic, and its grotesquely irresponsible to suggest otherwise. The leader of Boko Haram, Abubakar Shekau, must have been grotesquely irresponsible when he declared: The reason why I will kill you is you are infidels The Koran must be supreme, we must establish Islam in this country.
Obeidallah, who has produced and starred in a comedy film about Islamophobia, claims that the jihadists are twisting and hijacking his peaceful religion, and that only non-Muslim Islamophobes would dare think that anything they do has any justification in Islamic texts and teachings. But the possibility that murderers such as Jerad and Amanda Miller are twisting and hijacking peaceful conservative principles that do not in any essential or legitimate way incite to violence does not cross his mind.
Bergen, Obeidallah and others like them also believe that those who sound the alarm about Islamic terrorism are motivated by hatred and bigotry. Are they, then, also motivated by hatred and bigotry when they sound the alarm bout right-wing terrorism? Obeidallah claims that when Republicans passed anti-Sharia laws designed to protect Americans from a political system that subjugates women and non-Muslims and destroys the freedom of speech and freedom of conscience, they intended to demonize Muslims. So if legislation designed to protect Americans from right-wing terrorism were passed, could its framers and advocates be characterized as intending to demonize conservatives?
Why, yes, of course. That is the goal of this hysteria about right-wing extremism and right-wing terrorism: to demonize and marginalize legitimate opposition to the Obama agenda, as well as to minimize the real threat of jihad terror. Likewise, the goal of the hysteria about Islamophobia is to demonize and marginalize legitimate opposition to jihad terror, so that terror can advance unopposed and unimpeded. To trumpet both these hysterias, however, entangles Leftists like Bergen and Islamic supremacists like Obeidallah in a contradiction: they say that the stated beliefs and goals of Islamic terrorists are of no importance whatsoever, and it is hateful to point them out. Yet at the same time, they maintain that the stated beliefs and goals of right-wing terrorists, or even beliefs and goals that are ascribed to them by analysts and have no connection to what they actually believed, matter a great deal, and it is the nations duty to address them and institute remedies.
The hypocrisy is as obvious and stunning as the mainstream medias cheerful and unapologetic eagerness to traffic in it.
How did the Nazi’s refer to Germany, yes I remember, the homeland. The parallels are unmistakeable except to the intentionally deluded.
The Attorney General’s jihad against conservatives will fail as it must. The Foxwell militia from the eastern shore of Md fought alongside George Washington. We continue that struggle to protect our nation today.
Pro Obama agenda is PRO-GOVERNMENT EXTREMISM; to wit, terrorism no less than jihad terror.
PRO-GOVERNMENT EXTREMISTS act out in many ways.
The muggings, knockout game, mob attacks, murders, beatings.. look at the wicked hatred coming out of the White House, the Congress, the MSM, academia against those "who have too much" and how things should be more fair. How "they" stole "the people's" property.
Everyday the pro-government extremists are incited to violence out of being a "victim."
They just want us to submit to the fascism that is coming. That is why they keep calling up terrorists. The next step is taking away guns.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.