Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/11/2014 12:26:40 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Yet ANOTHER Lockheed POS!


2 posted on 06/11/2014 12:27:08 PM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Easily for a couple of billion dollars. Like Future Combat Systems the basic idea is flawed. It ignores mines, land fired missiles and small attack craft. It’s essentially an aluminum can with no ability to take damage. It will probably need to be escorted by heavier deeper draft ships which knocks it out of the littoral mission it was designed for.


3 posted on 06/11/2014 12:32:19 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The more LM weeds out its senior engineers as “cost-cutting” measures, the more the government shouldn’t trust their products. The technical knowledge base of the company is being depleted as each month goes by.


4 posted on 06/11/2014 12:34:18 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The LCS is a failed concept. But no one has the guts to admit it. It will serve as a “flaming datum” once the shooting starts.


5 posted on 06/11/2014 12:39:50 PM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In a world of longer range and deadlier weapons, the littoral warfare concept is flawed. LCS is not equipped to properly defend itself. Their solution is to make LCS into an Arleigh Burke. Build more Arleigh Burkes.


7 posted on 06/11/2014 1:32:00 PM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson