He also got a in the middle of the night and that's why he was out. Geesh. Can you prove he WASN"T killed??? Of course not, and neither can I, but I have a LOT more to base my suspicions on.
“Please, please read what you wrote......the researchers said it was POSSIBLE and there were several ways to do it!!”
What did they say was possible though? Did they say remotely hacking a random vehicle that you had not compromised beforehand by gaining physical access to was possible? Nope. Did they say that, even if they had been able to prep the vehicle beforedhand, they could remotely crash a vehicle? Nope. They showed it was possible, if you had access to the vehicle beforehand, to later remotely cause it to unlock or turn the engine on.
“f COURSE there is no “REPORTED” Hacking....don’t think that hackers would report that they did it!”
If this was something that was more than theoretical, criminals would be doing it, and one of the victims would have reported it.
“Hastings fiends and family said he drove like a “grandma”.....he was NOT a speeder.”
Well, the “hacking” that you think happened couldn’t have driven the car for him, and nobody else was in the vehicle. We have video of him NOT driving like a Grandma, so I think his friends and family obviously didn’t know him as well as they thought.
“Can you prove he WASN”T killed???”
That’s really not how things work. If you want to claim a crime was committed, the onus is on YOU to provide the evidence for it, hopefully before you go around calling other people idiots.