Right. Ooops, forgot about the Al Qaeda guys he's arming in Syria.... uh.. and the MB's guys in Egypt... and Hamas... and er...the Al Qaeda guys in Libya... That's IT.
Except for the Nigerian Islamists.
Fine. That's ALL.
And the meetings with the Iranian mullahs. Yep. No more.
Not a smidgeon!
Except for arming the Mexican Cartels in the Gunwalker scheme. Yeppers. Nuthin' there.
I think.
That's an outright lie. SOP for the Slimes pamphlet.
What is this TIME magazine of which you speak? Is it a watch catalog?
This seems to boil down to: “Obama is rubber, you’re glue.”
Yeah, kinda like the Pirate Code, eh, Jack?
Just when you think Time is no longer around, they pop up to show you exactly why you think that.
Don’t think Obama negotiated. Negotiations could not have produced such a horrible deal!
Terrorists were holding Bergdahl. Only those terrorists could agree to release him. Sell those six year old “mommy I didn’t do it” excuses somewhere else.
Those freaks down at Slime really need to grow up. They can’t continue kissing Obama’s *** and maintain any type of credibility. Hitler and Stalin would have loved today’s Time and they would have loved Hitler and Stalin.
Obama violated the letter and intent of the no-negotiation policy and he damn well knows it.
What is this “Time” of which you speak?
Well, of curse ODimwit negotiated with terrorists. However, the rest is correct. MANY a President has.
That is not the issue. The only issue is ... should they ever?
I have more regard for the Weekly World News.
I guess Time Warner was smart in spinning off their publishing business.
Obama has already admitted he has negotiated with terrorist. He admits using Qatar as a surrogate for the NEGOTIATIONS. Does not matter who represented Obama in those negotiations. He admits the negotiations occurred.
Michael Crowley - Time magazine
White House Overrode Internal Objections to Taliban Prisoner Release
To pull off the prisoner swap of five Taliban leaders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the White House overrode an existing interagency process charged with debating the transfer of Guantanamo Bay prisoners and dismissed long-standing Pentagon and intelligence community concerns based on Top Secret intelligence about the dangers of releasing the five men, sources familiar with the debate tell TIME.
http://time.com/2818827/taliban-bergdahl-pow-release-objections-white-house/
But officials in the Pentagon and intelligence communities had successfully fought off release of the five men in the past, officials tell TIME. This was out of the norm, says one official familiar with the debate over the dangers of releasing the five Taliban officials. There was never the conversation. Obamas move was an ultimate victory for those at the White House and the State Department who had previously argued the military should suck it up and salute, says the official familiar with the debate.
Those opposing release had the benefit of secret and top secret intelligence showing that the five men were a continuing threat, officials familiar with the debate tell TIME. But in the push from the White House and the State Department to clear the men, opponents to release found themselves under constant pressure to prove that the five were dangerous. It was a heavy burden to show they were bad, says the second source familiar with the debate.
Opponents of release say absent a peace deal with the Taliban, the release makes no sense. When our military is engaged in combat operations youre always going to err on the side of caution, says the first official familiar with the debate. Just conceptually, how much sense does it make to release your enemy when youre still at war with him?