Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yeah. Except for the Muslim Brotherhood guys that he pays to be in the White House.

Right. Ooops, forgot about the Al Qaeda guys he's arming in Syria.... uh.. and the MB's guys in Egypt... and Hamas... and er...the Al Qaeda guys in Libya... That's IT.

Except for the Nigerian Islamists.

Fine. That's ALL.

And the meetings with the Iranian mullahs. Yep. No more.

Not a smidgeon!

Except for arming the Mexican Cartels in the Gunwalker scheme. Yeppers. Nuthin' there.

I think.

1 posted on 06/03/2014 6:08:34 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum
Reagan also negotiated with the Mullahs, Time notes.

That's an outright lie. SOP for the Slimes pamphlet.

2 posted on 06/03/2014 6:09:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What is this TIME magazine of which you speak? Is it a watch catalog?


3 posted on 06/03/2014 6:11:35 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This seems to boil down to: “Obama is rubber, you’re glue.”


4 posted on 06/03/2014 6:13:31 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Fegelein! Fegelein! Fegelein!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
It's more of a general ideal than a hard-bound policy.

Yeah, kinda like the Pirate Code, eh, Jack?

5 posted on 06/03/2014 6:14:44 PM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Just when you think Time is no longer around, they pop up to show you exactly why you think that.


6 posted on 06/03/2014 6:20:44 PM PDT by cdcdawg (Be seeing you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Don’t think Obama negotiated. Negotiations could not have produced such a horrible deal!


7 posted on 06/03/2014 6:25:00 PM PDT by all the best (sat`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Terrorists were holding Bergdahl. Only those terrorists could agree to release him. Sell those six year old “mommy I didn’t do it” excuses somewhere else.


9 posted on 06/03/2014 6:28:24 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Those freaks down at Slime really need to grow up. They can’t continue kissing Obama’s *** and maintain any type of credibility. Hitler and Stalin would have loved today’s Time and they would have loved Hitler and Stalin.


13 posted on 06/03/2014 6:36:54 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
I'm really getting sick of this freakin' semantics game that's been going on since Clinton's infamous "it depends on what your definition of 'is' is."

Obama violated the letter and intent of the no-negotiation policy and he damn well knows it.

14 posted on 06/03/2014 6:38:28 PM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What is this “Time” of which you speak?


16 posted on 06/03/2014 6:44:17 PM PDT by Stand W ( You can't fight in here! This is the War Room!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Well, of curse ODimwit negotiated with terrorists. However, the rest is correct. MANY a President has.

That is not the issue. The only issue is ... should they ever?


18 posted on 06/03/2014 6:46:14 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Time magazine.

I have more regard for the Weekly World News.

20 posted on 06/03/2014 7:20:43 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I guess Time Warner was smart in spinning off their publishing business.


21 posted on 06/03/2014 8:03:28 PM PDT by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

22 posted on 06/03/2014 8:18:22 PM PDT by garjog (Obama: making the world safe for Sharia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Obama has already admitted he has negotiated with terrorist. He admits using Qatar as a surrogate for the NEGOTIATIONS. Does not matter who represented Obama in those negotiations. He admits the negotiations occurred.


23 posted on 06/03/2014 10:19:20 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Michael Crowley - Time magazine

24 posted on 06/03/2014 10:24:46 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

White House Overrode Internal Objections to Taliban Prisoner Release

To pull off the prisoner swap of five Taliban leaders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the White House overrode an existing interagency process charged with debating the transfer of Guantanamo Bay prisoners and dismissed long-standing Pentagon and intelligence community concerns based on Top Secret intelligence about the dangers of releasing the five men, sources familiar with the debate tell TIME.

http://time.com/2818827/taliban-bergdahl-pow-release-objections-white-house/


26 posted on 06/03/2014 10:33:52 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

But officials in the Pentagon and intelligence communities had successfully fought off release of the five men in the past, officials tell TIME. “This was out of the norm,” says one official familiar with the debate over the dangers of releasing the five Taliban officials. “There was never the conversation.” Obama’s move was an ultimate victory for those at the White House and the State Department who had previously argued the military should “suck it up and salute,” says the official familiar with the debate.

Those opposing release had the benefit of secret and top secret intelligence showing that the five men were a continuing threat, officials familiar with the debate tell TIME. But in the push from the White House and the State Department to clear the men, opponents to release found themselves under constant pressure to prove that the five were dangerous. “It was a heavy burden to show they were bad,” says the second source familiar with the debate.

Opponents of release say absent a peace deal with the Taliban, the release makes no sense. “When our military is engaged in combat operations you’re always going to err on the side of caution,” says the first official familiar with the debate. “Just conceptually, how much sense does it make to release your enemy when you’re still at war with him?”


27 posted on 06/03/2014 10:36:46 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson