Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Overrode Internal Objections To Taliban Prisoner Release
Time ^ | 6/3/2014 | Massimo Calabresi

Posted on 06/03/2014 3:29:26 PM PDT by mojito

To pull off the prisoner swap of five Taliban leaders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the White House overrode an existing interagency process charged with debating the transfer of Guantanamo Bay prisoners and dismissed long-standing Pentagon and intelligence community concerns based on Top Secret intelligence about the dangers of releasing the five men, sources familiar with the debate tell TIME.

National Security Council officials at the White House decline to describe the work of the ad hoc process they established to trade the prisoners, or to detail the measures they have taken to limit the threat the Taliban officials may pose. They say consensus on the plan was reached by the top officials of Obama’s national security team, including representatives from the Pentagon, State Department, intelligence community and Joint Chiefs of Staff. “These releases were worked extensively through deputies and principals,” says National Security Counsel Deputy for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes. “There was not a dissent on moving forward with this plan.”

But officials in the Pentagon and intelligence communities had successfully fought off release of the five men in the past, officials tell TIME. “This was out of the norm,” says one official familiar with the debate over the dangers of releasing the five Taliban officials. “There was never the conversation.”

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bergdahl; cia; gitmo; guantanamo; nsc; obama; pentagon; taliban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
No Congress, no CIA, no Pentagon.

Just Barry and Val and the NSC. Kind of a small loop.

1 posted on 06/03/2014 3:29:27 PM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mojito

Jihad means a lot to 0dirka.


2 posted on 06/03/2014 3:30:51 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

He’s King of the world. The world approved with a Nobel for existing. We approved twice electing him. He knows none will oppose him. None that have any cred.


3 posted on 06/03/2014 3:31:24 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Translation: “Hillary wouldn’t have done this.”


4 posted on 06/03/2014 3:32:44 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Whatever President Jarrett wants, President Jarrett gets.


5 posted on 06/03/2014 3:33:05 PM PDT by Arsynic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

And then the White House is “Surprised” at the negative reception they have received fro this ill-conceived action?

I swear these people just sit around and only talk to each other. The rest of the country is a big “What-ever” between D.C. and the west coast. And that includes those people in his ‘Home-town’ of Chicago.


6 posted on 06/03/2014 3:33:26 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

It’s almost as if the shadowy cabal of Leftists who snuck Obama into the Oval Office want to help America’s enemies.


7 posted on 06/03/2014 3:37:07 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

A few years back there was a movie about a computer generated actress. She was a complete virtual creation that the public thought was real.
He is a creation of money, the media and leftist ideology. So too with Obama. He eats and breaths but the rest is all a made up lie.
He and his handlers actions exist in their own virtual world. Unfortunately their world of make believe has real world effects.


8 posted on 06/03/2014 3:38:07 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Something’s fishy. Time, The Daily Beast, Chris Matthews, the Associated Press and more going after Obama? Huh?


9 posted on 06/03/2014 3:40:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

He’s “Jonathan S. Tuttle” from the M*A*S*H episode...

“There’s a little Tuttle left in all of us, in fact you might say that all of us together made up Tuttle.”


10 posted on 06/03/2014 3:40:37 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Oh so very very true.


11 posted on 06/03/2014 3:42:48 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Hillary said she supported it...we should remind her of her support as she tries to run for ruler.

This was a criminal act and she thought it was a good idea.

Indeed.


12 posted on 06/03/2014 3:44:30 PM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Adder

I get the feeling she supported it, before she didn’t support it.


13 posted on 06/03/2014 3:45:28 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Indeed:

"The question of the release of the five Taliban leaders was a recurrent subject of debate in the administration and was a key element of the behind the scenes effort by the State Department and the White House to negotiate a peace deal with the Taliban. The transfer of the five was discussed as a possible confidence-building measure to pave the way for a deal. The debates over their release were contentious, officials familiar with them say."

I'd add that the outing of the CIA's Kabul station chief last week was just a little WH payback for his "contentious" opposition.

14 posted on 06/03/2014 3:48:33 PM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I would like to quote Hillary on this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-Rjj3ldB7U


15 posted on 06/03/2014 3:48:46 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mojito

“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark”


16 posted on 06/03/2014 3:56:55 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It was the episode when here plane took fire. That changed her mind.


17 posted on 06/03/2014 4:03:19 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mojito

From the Time article:

“The question of the release of the five Taliban leaders was a recurrent subject of debate in the administration and was a key element of the behind the scenes effort by the State Department and the White House to negotiate a peace deal with the Taliban. The transfer of the five was discussed as a possible confidence-building measure to pave the way for a deal.”
and
“Opponents of release say absent a peace deal with the Taliban, the release makes no sense.”

Obama is trying to negotiate a peace treaty with the Taliban.


18 posted on 06/03/2014 4:04:20 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito
This is arguably the most heinous act of Treason in the history of the Republic.

Treason being defined as "a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state".

The release of the enemy's high command in a sham exchange for an enemy sympathizer and collaborator over the objections the security apparatus of the USA displays a basic lack of allegiance by the POTUS to the United States of America.

All 57 of them.

.

.

19 posted on 06/03/2014 4:04:37 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojito

Did the CIA station Chief in Afghanistan dare to oppose the will of hussein?


20 posted on 06/03/2014 4:05:13 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson