Posted on 06/02/2014 3:58:15 PM PDT by Libloather
WASHINGTON (AP) The five Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi are being counted on to defend the Obama administration's record as November's elections creep closer. All five voted against the special investigation and most have described it as a political stunt and waste of time.
Each now says it's important to participate in the GOP-led probe of how a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed at a U.S. diplomatic installation in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012, and how the administration responded.
They say that without their presence, Republican accusations against President Barack Obama, his top officials and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, a possible presidential front-runner in 2016, would go unchallenged.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.msn.com ...
No use them looking for the truth of what happened.
Washington, (home of) Democratic Chutzpah. It just makes sense.
Block and stop Cummings will try his best to have nothing happen
They are going to make complete asses of themselves, fighting like hell to make sure the truth doesn’t come out.
Ummmmmm.....the Dummies better shut-up.....they could get enmeshed in the burgeoning Obama/Clinton scandal.
News hound Bob Woodward Definitely Doesnt Buy Hillarys Benghazi Denial. Woodward doesnt believe Hillary's whine that it's all about politics. The reporter known for making news claims there are still serious, unanswered questions about this.
Hillary's book stoutly declares that everything there is to know about Benghazi has already been revealed....she is hoping to silence Republicans by charging politics is behind the continuing probe.
Woodward will not be dissuaded. ".....one of the questions I have -- did she keep a diary? Obama confirmed to Woodward that he keeps a diary. Woodward noted. Ronald Reagan kept a very detailed diary of Iran Contra, and he turned it over.
The veteran Post reporter also knocked Clinton and Obama....... noting its not all about partisan politics. There are facts, he asserted. There is neutral inquiry. And there is a way to look at this and get that information and see if there is new information.
Next thing you know, Bob Woodward will be comparing Benghazi to Watergate.
What are they defending? Who are they defending against?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.