But she went on their shows and deliberately lied. How can they in good conscience ever have her back again—at least without making those past lies an issue this morning!
But you know they won't. Little Georgia and Fat Candy will just smile and act like it never even happened because, hey, it's all about the Leftist agenda, right?
Take what info/intel she will give up see what their latest chatting points are,view it from an intel from the enemy stance instead of an outrage.
I mean what did you expect from the DBM? Fair and balanced?
But she went on their shows and deliberately lied. How can they in good conscience ever have her back again—at least without making those past lies an issue this morning!
The Lamers evoke a reference to what became of international cycling in the Lance Armstrong era. Because all entrants were doing illegal steroids, the first and foremost qualifying characteristic was the necessity to TAKE them. If you didn’t take ‘roids, you didn’t get in to the races.
By the same token, if you are not willing to do the bidding of the Demovik orthodoxy you will have no way IN to a job in the Lamestream Media Industrial Complex.
The want-ad really should read, “must have a grasp for distortion, fabrication, disinformation and smear campaigns....Knowledge of Soviet-era propaganda techniques and tactics helpful. Typing skills, too.”
As with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, what any credible talk show host should do is correct the record, to include inviting them back to tell the truth and apologize! Several examples how Geithner backed away sourced here. I’ve just added the warnings about the IOU’s for the taxpayers sake...
Geithner Fretted Over Social Security Deficits — Before the Dog Whistle
http://www.foxbusiness.com/2014/05/12/geithner-demanded-social-security-reformbefore-dog-whistle/
In treating Social Security like a slush fund, the federal government has borrowed, spent and vowed to pay back the $2.5 trillion or so “surplus” in payroll tax revenue it has siphoned out of Social Security. The money has been spent but the federal government has promised to pay it back.
In 2009, trustees, including Geithner, for Social Security issued a bleak report indicating the fund would start taking in fewer tax revenues versus the benefits it will pay out starting in 2016, the point in time when the federal government has to start paying the fund — meaning, taxpayers – back, with interest.