Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
No, we had growth, an expanding economy, hope, and were clearly becoming the world's leading manufacturer. Are you always intentionally obtuse?

And yes, China continues to promise social reforms "someday"... but the CCP is surviving primarily on the economic growth, which they actually have to limit to keep inflation in check. The much poorer and more rural western half of the country is not benefiting nearly as quickly as the more urban eastern half, and it leads to frequent friction, especially if/when prices rise. They have a very delicate balancing act, and they know it won't last forever, hence the other measures mentioned in the article... but again, it is the massive growth of the middle class that really keeps the peace in China.

13 posted on 05/31/2014 9:44:32 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317

No, the comparison between Red China and the USA is what’s “obtuse” in fact. The only reason Red China even has a middle class is heavily due to US trade, never mind the other entanglements; the USA grew its own middle class independently of foreign trade, being mostly autarkic thanks to being a free internal market (i.e. before the progressives could tear that down as they did bit by bit after the war).

Red China has spoken of “social reform” ever since coming into existence. No such reforms are possible under a one-party state.


17 posted on 05/31/2014 9:54:02 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson