Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2014 9:06:09 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oliviaforever

Only two things come from Texas....


2 posted on 05/28/2014 9:07:57 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Welcome to the freak show...


3 posted on 05/28/2014 9:10:27 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Bovine excrement. This is gay and transgendered supremacy plain and simple.


4 posted on 05/28/2014 9:12:10 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Isn’t the mayor a lesbian?


5 posted on 05/28/2014 9:12:45 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Let the lawsuits begin...


7 posted on 05/28/2014 9:15:19 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Pastor coalition final statement on ERO to Houston City Council

Baptist Ministers Association of Houston * Houston Area Pastor Council Houston Ministers Against Crime * AME Ministers Alliance of Houston/Gulf Coast * Northeast Ministers Alliance * South Texas Full Gospel Baptist Fellowship * South Texas District Council of the Assemblies of God* National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference

To Honorable Houston City Council Members:

We have prepared and presented to you on multiple occasions the many reasons we have been compelled to oppose the “Equal Rights Ordinance” proposed by Mayor Parker. As we have shown and provided via testimony and the legal briefs from our counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom, the serious flaws in both process and content were and are irreconcilable.

We have shown that the ordinance is unnecessary and based on vague, anecdotal incidents that cannot withstand scrutiny of basic evidentiary process. Mayor Parker has acknowledged that this is primarily about the LGBT community and the city attorney in his public comments at the committee meeting acknowledged there was not a legitimate local need.

We have raised our concerns as to the privacy and protection of women and children through the Public Accommodations section that is not better, but worse, with the removal of 17-51 (b). When the city attorney said he couldn’t find any incidents where there was a problem, we provided many. We have revealed the direct threat to the freedoms of religion and speech against business owners who simply practice business according to their faith by following principles we once applauded.

We reject the comparison of sexual behavior and the definition of gender identity with race, religion, sex and physical disability that are immutable, unchangeable classes. Our Black pastors and congregations in particular, also our Hispanic and Asian pastors and churches, find it patently offensive to equate the color of their skin, which they did not choose, with a person’s lifestyle choice. Additionally, the Civil Rights movement has been about making sure everyone has the same rights.

We believe that this ordinance gives special rights to a people group who already has the same rights as everyone else. Finally, the attached polling confirms that lop-sided outpouring of calls and emails to your offices. Over eighty percent of “We the People” do NOT want this ordinance.

We consider a vote for this ordinance as a vote against “We the People.” We cannot nor will not overlook such a vote in all future opportunities to hold those council members accountable for such an action who cast that vote.


8 posted on 05/28/2014 9:22:43 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

can I ask a stupid question?

What rights were being denied to gay and trans-whatever residents of Houston? Considering our various constitutional rights, freedom of speech, the right to vote,etc., which rights were being denied, that they felt the need to pass this so called equal rights ordinance???


9 posted on 05/28/2014 9:35:22 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (et)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

When some perv claims to be transgendered and uses the women’s restroom and rapes someone, I hope the city gets sued for pushing this idiotic ruling. Instead, what will probably happen is the police will question someone for using the women’s restroom and then that guy will sue the city for discrimination.


16 posted on 05/28/2014 10:16:02 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

Texas... Has it gotten to the point that conservatives should abandon all urban areas?


20 posted on 05/28/2014 10:58:24 PM PDT by BurningOak (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

One must wonder how selectively protecting certain folks over others makes things fall in with “equal protections”.


23 posted on 05/29/2014 3:41:15 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oliviaforever

These ordinances are nothing but Christian discrimination laws. Completely unconstitutional.


24 posted on 05/29/2014 6:55:38 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson