He makes good points, and all in all, I agree with him. I think the anti GMO food hysteria is misplaced, but there are still enough reasons to be concerned, so therefore I would still prefer to eat non-GMO food.
I’d think better of his case if he at least acknowledged the other side. E.g., Europe’s ban, the only very short-term tests that have been conducted, and the worrisome results from some of those tests.
This is so laughably one-sided as to discredit his argument, IMO.