Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

Science via AP (From www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7285683/)

A. The arrow points to a tissue fragment that is still elastic. It beggars belief that elastic tissue like this could have lasted for 65 million years.

B. Another instance of ‘fresh appearance’ which similarly makes it hard to believe in the ‘millions of years’.

C. Regions of bone showing where the fibrous structure is still present, compared to most fossil bones which lack this structure. But these bones are claimed to be 65 million years old, yet they manage to retain this structure.

CMI article captions and image.

2 posted on 05/27/2014 8:52:29 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fishtank
It beggars belief that elastic tissue like this could have lasted for 65 million years.

Evidence doesn't care what you believe.

7 posted on 05/27/2014 9:29:09 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson