To: SoConPubbie
The author has it wrong.
The republican party has always been the republican party.
The teaparty is too weak to stand on its own and tried to hijack the republican party by winning a few selected primaries.
So now that teaparty failed, they are all mad. Well boo hoo, the republicans were here first.
15 posted on
05/24/2014 3:11:57 AM PDT by
staytrue
To: staytrue
You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about.
To: staytrue
“Follow the money”
Unfortunately, this appears to be true even for “conservatives”.
19 posted on
05/24/2014 5:49:32 AM PDT by
onedoug
To: staytrue
Get real. If it wasn’t for the Tea Party, the Republican Party would have already gone by the way of the Whigs. Who do you think gave the Republicans the House majority in 2010? It damn sure wasn’t Karl Rove.
To: staytrue
So now that teaparty failed, they are all mad. Well boo hoo, the republicans were here first.
So you think political losses will stop the millions of conservatives that identify as Tea-Party members will now just roll over and submit to the treachery, Democrat-Collaborating and Corporate Cronyism of the GOP-E?
26 posted on
05/24/2014 8:46:56 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: staytrue
So now that teaparty failed, they are all mad. Well boo hoo, the republicans were here first.
How do you explain the massive wins by Tea-Party candidates at the state-level?
You do realize that the tea-party is destroying the GOP-E by doing this right?
27 posted on
05/24/2014 8:49:09 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson