Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver

Looking at records in general, not as to any one person, could be a public health reason in order to discover if certain illnesses are up or down.

To screen records as to individuals sounds like death panel business to see if you have reached your end date as treatment would be costly should you linger.


16 posted on 05/20/2014 7:03:50 PM PDT by RicocheT (Where neither their property nor their honor is touched, most men live content, Niccolo Machiavelli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RicocheT

“Looking at records in general, not as to any one person, could be a public health reason in order to discover if certain illnesses are up or down.”

They do this now. They are empowered by law to do this now for many communicable illnesses. I’d actually be in favor of this if the data was “guaranteed” to be used at a city, state, or regional level that was personally unidentifiable. Problem is, I trust them with this information less than I would trust the Chinese government or Al Quieda with it. Seriously.


19 posted on 05/20/2014 7:21:13 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson