Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CitizenUSA
We don't need no steenking rule of law.
14 posted on 05/18/2014 5:58:08 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

“We don’t need no steenking rule of law.”

The sad thing about it from my perspective is that the rule of law benefits everyone, both left and right. It is far, far better for a court to strictly interpret the law, because a new law can always be passed to clarify what was meant. If we continue to let judges act like super legislators, no one can predict where they’ll go next, and that harms all of us (even though a faction might claim temporary victory).

The US Constitution was an excellent foundation, but it wasn’t good enough for some factions that didn’t have the votes necessary to do an amendment. Much narrower majorities (maybe even political minorities) used judges to thwart the law while claiming to actually follow it!

Now we have ever evolving “standards” that depend on who stacks the courts. That helps no one, not even those who foolishly think it’s good to use the courts to hammer their neighbors. Our judges have become super legislators, and what’s done today can be quickly undone tomorrow by the same techniques.


17 posted on 05/18/2014 6:31:30 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (America for Americans first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson