Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

SCOTUS is responsible for this, in some measure. Their ruling gave the enviroNazis legal standing.


5 posted on 05/17/2014 8:48:22 AM PDT by cld51860 (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cld51860

You are probably referencing their ruling that the epa may regulate CO2. Too bad there aren’t any scientist on the panel. Coming soon, regulating the amount of solar radiation you may legally absorb in a given time period. Want some extra rays? You can buy some.


9 posted on 05/17/2014 8:51:32 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: cld51860
I'd suggest that there were indications of that with the Kelo decision, too.

With Kelo, SCOTUS essentially rolled the dice and bet that since the New London redevelopment plan would guarantee increased tax revenues for the city, they could justify redefinging the 5th amendment "public use" into what was not written in the Constitution, "public good."

They rolled snake eyes.

Now SCOTUS has bet on the weather, too?

-PJ

28 posted on 05/17/2014 3:09:03 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson