Posted on 05/13/2014 7:32:47 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
Law professors John Eastman of Chapman University and Martin Lederman of Georgetown debated the religious implications of ObamaCares contraception mandate during a panel discussion at a recent Federalist Society conference.
With the passage of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (or RFRA), Congress was trying to restore a 200-year-old understanding of what the free exercise clause did for religious conscience. He said, The First Amendment was not there to protect religions that could only get their accommodations through the majoritarian process.
With religion, You can challenge the sincerity of religious beliefs but cannot challenge the merits of it and people have to respect that. Eastman said, [Its] amazing that a large number of the people who are arguing that a corporation cannot exercise a religious conscience are the same people that routinely insist that corporations should exercise a social conscience.
You cant have it both ways. Theres not a subset, religious conscience is a part of overall conscience that we expect corporations to exercise at all times and by doing so, they are clear RFRA violations.
Somewhat discordantly, instead of forcing companies like Hobby Lobby to pay for contraceptive care as a part of ObamaCares employer mandate, Eastman suggested the government come up with a general fund via an alternative or general tax.
Lederman argued, There is no contraception mandate because it doesnt force them [owners] to pay for the coverage. This turns out the law isnt that there is no legal mandate to do so. He went on and said that employers can choose not to provide health insurance to their employees and thereby avoid the non-existent mandate. Lederman admitted that this is a really hard and intricate question, and very case-specific regarding ObamaCare and pressuring businesses to provide or drop coverage.
He cited a study which said, They expect that 90%
[of employers] will in fact stop providing health insurance
this will not only be economically feasible or rational for the companies, but a new reality of health insurance coverage.
Obama is a disgusting piece of trash..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.