[wideawake]

Sterling's first argument was that his original remarks were just part of his "rap" in trying to get a woman to commit adultery with him.

Now he's arguing that Earvin Johnson is not good for the NBA because of his enthusiastic adultery.

As for the dispute over ownership, he's the one who decided to buy an asset that came with strings attached.

[DoodleDawg]

Now he's arguing that Earvin Johnson is not good for the NBA because of his enthusiastic adultery.

This from the man who got in trouble originally for arguing with his mistress?