Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cripplecreek

I can’t imagine how they’d get reliable spectroscopic information on something that small, faint, and distant. Imagine something the size of the Earth orbiting Proxima Centauri (the closest star to our sun). I doubt that they’d be able to distinguish it from (say) something like Venus.


4 posted on 05/06/2014 8:37:50 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ek_hornbeck
I can’t imagine how they’d get reliable spectroscopic information on something that small, faint, and distant.

It would be speculation at best. Since chlorophyll absorbs light (except for green 500-600nm) saying that astronomers have 'found' chlorophyll means that they simply have found nothing in that spectrum. It would have to be comparitive spectrometry between reflected red and blue wavelengths (<500nm annd >500nm) but that could be practically anything without direct observation.

10 posted on 05/06/2014 8:45:43 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ek_hornbeck

Funding! That’s how they do it. And then they’ll need motivating results for more funding, so the results will be “encouraging”. By the time the fundees die, they’ll have made a good life on scamming Uncle Sugar. Let’s just be sure none of these failed AGW scientists didn’t move over to this project.


17 posted on 05/06/2014 10:01:23 AM PDT by SgtHooper (This is my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson