Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
The Hill ^

Posted on 05/05/2014 12:01:36 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel

By Justin Sink - 05/05/14 02:40 PM EDT

The White House suggested Monday it may not cooperate with a new House select committee investigating the terror attack in Benghazi.

Press secretary Jay Carney said that the White House has "always cooperated with legitimate oversight," but called the new probe a “highly partisan effort to politicize” the deadly attack.

"If you look at even what some Republicans have said, it certainly casts doubt on the legitimacy of an effort that is so partisan in nature," Carney said.

"I don't think there are many people, including some Republicans… who believe that this is necessary after seven congressional committees and multiple investigations," he added.

Carney refused to answer questions directly about whether the White House would cooperate, but he noted that there had been 13 congressional hearings, 50 member-and staff briefings, and over 25,000 pages of documents produced over the September 11, 2012 terror attack, in which four Americans were killed.

"One thing this Congress is not short on is investigations into what happened before, during, and after Benghazi," he said.

"And all of these investigations… have found that the facts as we describe them, in terms of how we approach this, remain exactly as we described them then, the facts of yesterday or the facts today," Carney continued. "And they will be the facts no matter how often or for how long Republicans engage in highly partisan efforts to politicize what was a tragedy."

Earlier Monday, Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced that Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) will head the new select committee.

Boehner decided to call for the committee last week, after the revelation of an email from White House deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, who recommended then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice should “underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”

The White House has maintained that Rhodes was merely prepping Rice to discuss protests across the Middle East, and not the Benghazi incident specifically. Republicans, though, said the document is evidence the White House was pushing the narrative that the violence in Benghazi grew from anger over an anti-Islam YouTube to protect the president's bid for reelection.

“Trey Gowdy is as dogged, focused, and serious-minded as they come,” Boehner said in a statement announcing the appointment on Monday. “His background as a federal prosecutor and his zeal for the truth make him the ideal person to lead this panel.

“I know he shares my commitment to get to the bottom of this tragedy and will not tolerate any stonewalling from the Obama administration,” Boehner continued.

But Carney repeatedly dismissed the effort as conspiratorial and politically motivated.

"At some point you just have to assume Republicans will continue this because it feeds a political objective of some point," Carney said.

"The facts begin not to matter to those who fervently want to believe something else," he added.

Carney also chided Republicans for not focusing on issues "Americans really care about," like the economy.

"The effort to politicize this has continued unabated," Carney said.

House Democrats have not yet said whether they would participate in the select committee. Carney said the White House would leave it up to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on whether to participate.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bananarepublic; benghazi; benghazicoverup; benrhodes; carneylies; carnivalbarker; contempt; demboycott; jaycarney; libya; obamalies; remove; selectcommittee; susanrice; whpresser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: Dead Corpse

I thought just the AG (Eric WithHolder) could appoint SP. Could be wrong, though. Bonehead should’ve done this select committee a year ago.


61 posted on 05/05/2014 12:56:05 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Jay Carney would be the first one I would call in to testify. Get his sorry ass on record with the threat perjury.


62 posted on 05/05/2014 12:56:43 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

All facilitated with the help of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is in the Obama administration.


63 posted on 05/05/2014 12:58:02 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

And did the next best thing. Put a former FEDERAL prosecutor in charge of the committee.


A former federal prosecutor that never lost a case. Looks like Obama is getting himself all wee wee’d up...


64 posted on 05/05/2014 12:59:00 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hell, Obama will double down. He’ll go public and offer Al Quaeda US weaponry, especially nuclear weapons.


65 posted on 05/05/2014 12:59:40 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Precisely what drove the nails in Nixon’s coffin.


66 posted on 05/05/2014 1:00:46 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Nope. They’ll tap dance around this for the next 2 years.


The mid-term elections will resolve the matter,as the GOP will retake the Senate. The threat of impeachment then can be used as an incentive to modify the One’s behavior.


67 posted on 05/05/2014 1:00:56 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
If the WH refuses to cooperate, it's time for the House to exercise their unilateral powers of arrest with or without the DOJ.

WHY HAS NO ONE BEEN BROUGHT TO JUSTICE OVER THE ATTACK ON BENGHAZI? What do the perps know that the WH fears the media will find out????

68 posted on 05/05/2014 1:03:23 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

I have been reading the Politico comments. The paid 0bots are out in force.

I no longer believe the Left and Right can live in the same country. This is war on a political level at present.

We do not believe the same things, do not support the same arguments, and at least for Democrats, do not brook opposition.

They are holding their breath until they turn blue. Not to uphold their sworn duty to oversee an investigation? Really? That’s the best you got?


69 posted on 05/05/2014 1:04:07 PM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel. "

So what else is new? I guess these morons don't realize that the select panel is being formed because they haven't cooperated previously.

70 posted on 05/05/2014 1:05:17 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

I think everyone knows. The United States has been sending arms to hot spots around the world forever.
The problem here is we have a complicit media and a Muslim usurper sending arms to our direct enemy. Weapons that have killed Americans on the battlefield. It is enraging, it is HIGH TREASON!


71 posted on 05/05/2014 1:10:55 PM PDT by TsonicTsunami08 (SEND BITCOIN 1CYfujvffxKKPHKvrQvLP3CDb3Z5Lu7LwM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I stand by my initial conclusion,

Obama had the Ambassador assassinated.

There was no movie...

There was no terrorist attack...


72 posted on 05/05/2014 1:11:33 PM PDT by EBH (And the head wound was healed, and Gog became man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I'm waiting for Obama to follow in the footsteps of King Charles I of England, and disolve Congress and have Boehner and Gowdy imprisoned.

-PJ

73 posted on 05/05/2014 1:14:56 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel——Then kill them all, start with carney.


74 posted on 05/05/2014 1:19:16 PM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Which begs the question: What will the House do when the WH ignores their subpoena?

When folks refuse to show up at hearings?

I say not jack. They don't have the guts for the fight they're about to start.

The vast majority of the GOP members are a disgrace to their party and their country.

75 posted on 05/05/2014 1:20:44 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
"f the House really meant it, they would have appointed a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR and just gone for it. "

The Congress does not have the authority to appoint a SP. Only the AG can do that.

Go figure.

76 posted on 05/05/2014 1:22:25 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
They have no choice but to cooperate - that's what subpoenas are for.
77 posted on 05/05/2014 1:24:10 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Maybe they are getting advice from Hillary. She was there when Nixon said the same crap.


78 posted on 05/05/2014 1:26:29 PM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They haven’t cooperated to this point anyway.


79 posted on 05/05/2014 1:28:49 PM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They’ve had a committee investigating and it had no teeth. Does a “select” committee have any more teeth?


80 posted on 05/05/2014 1:29:34 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson