Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I can't believe the detail in this article written two days after the terror attack in Benghazi. Almost everything in this article has turned out to be true, yet I haven't seen any of these reporters defend their work.

The administration knew all of this almost immediately. And why doesn't anyone mention the Al zawahiri video? Seems like a very important point. He specifically called for attacks on Americans in Libya the day before the benghazi attack.

1 posted on 05/01/2014 8:35:08 PM PDT by cubs25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cubs25

ahhh but the real question is.......how long did Hillary know about “ the internet video “ before.....BEFORE......Benghazi.


2 posted on 05/01/2014 8:38:58 PM PDT by advertising guy ( <------------- lotta white in here ------------>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cubs25
You are forgetting the Demorat talking points:

"Nothing here! -does't have anything to do with Benghazi! - it was the movie! - etc., etc., etc.!

3 posted on 05/01/2014 9:06:15 PM PDT by celmak (Darn, forgot the "c" again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...

Benghazi ping.

Benghazi is blowing up big-time, and I cannot keep up with all the stories, especially as I will be away without internet for the weekend. But this one looked particularly good.

So do let me, Republicanprofessor, know of any especially exciting stories and I will do my best to catch up with pings when I get back.

Also let me know if you want on or off this Benghazi ping list.


4 posted on 05/02/2014 5:29:07 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cubs25

Remember this. Mohammar Ghadaffi would have done a better job protecting the lives of the Begghazi 4 , than Obama did, and Obama effectively had his proxy thugs execute the man.


6 posted on 05/02/2014 6:29:27 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cubs25

Add this piece to the puzzle
Rice received a tweet telling her what was happening during the attack. She knowingly lied to the five networks

http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/2014/04/benghazi-91112-617-pm-susan-rice-given-tweet-from-freelancer-jomanacnn-in-libya-ansar-al-sharia-attacking-benghazi-compound/


7 posted on 05/02/2014 6:30:02 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cubs25

Ex-AFRICOM Brig. General: Military Should Have Responded to Benghazi Attack

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On May 1, 2014 In The Point

General Lovell also served as the Deputy Commanding General of Joint Task Force ODYSSEY GUARD with the mission to plan for any potential United States military missions in Libya following the fall of the regime of Moammar Gadhafi. Joint Task Force ODYSSEY GUARD was instrumental in providing support to the Department of State as it reopened the United States Embassy in Tripoli.

Parts of retired Air Force Brigadier General Robert Lovell’s testimony are technical having to do with AFRICOM, but he makes one very important point. The Obama side on the Benghazi side has repeatedly claimed that there wasn’t enough time to do anything. But that’s a retroactive argument.

If you do nothing, then you’re rolling the dice that the enemy might finish off your people before you could have done something and then you have an excuse.
Instead of a military response to Benghazi, Obama absurdly enough sent in the FBI.
Lovell’s testimony is the first from a member of the military who was at Africa Command at the time of the attack. Lovell was deputy director for intelligence at Africa Command.

Lovell did not question the Pentagon claim that it could not have scrambled forces in the region quickly enough to have prevented the deaths of the Americans. Lovell said no one at the time of the attack knew how long it would go, so could not have determined then that there was no use in trying.

“As the attack was ongoing, it was unclear whether it was an attempted kidnapping, rescue, recovery, protracted hostile engagement or any or all of the above,” Lovell said.
It’s not just about the timeline. It’s about the fact that Obama and Hillary refused to even try and that their response was to shift blame and send a scapegoat to prison for offending Muslims.

Cummings broke in with his buffoon act again.
“Why are you testifying that the U.S. military did not try to save lives,” Cummings asked.

Lovell said he was not disputing that information.

“We should have continued to move forward with whatever forces we had to move forward with,” Lovell said.

He described a sense of desperation while attack unfolded when asked by Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, how the military responded during the attack.

“We sent a drone overhead,” Lovell said, almost mumbling. “It was desperation…. There was a lot of waiting for State Department for what it was that they wanted.”
Which means that it really came down to what Hillary wanted.

“We didn’t know how long this would last when we became aware of the distress nor did we completely understand what we had in front of us, be it a kidnapping, rescue, recovery, protracted hostile engagement or any or all of the above,” Lovell said. “But what we did know quite early on was that this was a hostile action. This was no demonstration gone terribly awry.”

But the lie had to be told anyway.


14 posted on 05/02/2014 10:02:17 AM PDT by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cubs25

bump


15 posted on 11/12/2015 1:06:33 AM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson