Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. says Obamacare enrollment points to stable costs
Reuters ^ | May 1, 2014 | BY DAVID MORGAN

Posted on 05/01/2014 2:58:13 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

The Obama administration on Thursday predicted stable health insurance costs for consumers who have purchased Obamacare plans, defying critics who warn that President Barack Obama's landmark healthcare law will lead to skyrocketing premiums.

Thursday's report said 12.8 million people obtained coverage through the marketplaces or government health programs for the poor during Obamacare's open enrollment, including over 4.8 million who gained coverage through the Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: failure; lies; obamacare; rinocare
So the $2,500 was an election year lie.
1 posted on 05/01/2014 2:58:13 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Increasing costs at a rapid rate is stability?? Who knew?


2 posted on 05/01/2014 3:00:59 PM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Al Reuters...carrying Osama Obama’s water.Yet again.
3 posted on 05/01/2014 3:05:05 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Eighty-five percent of Obamacare marketplace applicants sought federal subsidies to help pay for coverage, the report said.

'Nuff said.

4 posted on 05/01/2014 3:06:10 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: refermech
Here is a Saturn V multi-stage rocket in a moment of similar "stability."


5 posted on 05/01/2014 3:21:12 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: refermech

“Increasing costs at a rapid rate is stability?? Who knew?”

So, this means I will NOT be getting my $2,500 check??????


6 posted on 05/01/2014 3:21:13 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

I was thinking more in terms of THIS being “stable”...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:V-1_%28Fieseler_Fi_103%29_in_flight.jpg


7 posted on 05/01/2014 3:25:02 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG
[Eighty-five percent of Obamacare marketplace applicants sought federal subsidies to help pay for coverage, the report said. . .’Nuff said.]

If 85 percent of enrollees are subsidized the participating insurers can make a profit but not the HHS. Obama promised this program was “revenue neutral.” In fact it will require huge allocations from taxpayers.

8 posted on 05/01/2014 3:28:40 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
We are so scr****. All this money...and nothing available to buy goods....or food for that matter.

And factories will come?? Sure...

9 posted on 05/01/2014 3:30:42 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

True, a typical American can afford insurance to get health care at a stable now.
The straw may not always be fresh but the stalls are clean- well, clean for stalls- and airy.


10 posted on 05/01/2014 3:31:18 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Thursday's report said 12.8 million people obtained coverage

I am confused. Didn't Odumbo hold a press conference on April first at which he stated that 7.1 million people had enrolled?

Now the number is 12.8 million??? How?

This is like having a three card monty dealer for a brother-in-law...
11 posted on 05/01/2014 3:31:48 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (Fluent in two languages: English and cursive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
it will require huge allocations from taxpayers.

That's what I'm thinking too.

Only question is, how's Obama going to do it (or try to do it).

12 posted on 05/01/2014 3:35:56 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

A decrease in the increase.
Whatev!....


13 posted on 05/01/2014 5:53:31 PM PDT by 4Liberty (Optimal institutions - optimal economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson