Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy

It’s the old...at least mormonS aren’t flying into buildings argument.
Love has a good chance of wining, however if her opposition is a white man mormon she will lose.
See post #170, it’s just the way it is.


182 posted on 04/29/2014 7:43:35 AM PDT by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: svcw

He opponent is White, male, and a FELLOW Mormon. And yet She has close to a 100% chance of winning and winning EASILY at that. It’s not gonna be close buddy.

I WILL ping you to the thread with the election results to show you that you don’t know what you are talking about, and I will rub it in your face in it. I look forward to reading the lame excuse you will come up to explain why you were wrong.

Like I said I don’t give a damn about Mormonism or why you don’t like it. What I can’t stand is people talking out of their butts when it comes to politics.


187 posted on 04/29/2014 7:53:09 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

To: svcw

“Love has a good chance of wining, however if her opposition is a white man mormon she will lose.”


First of all, Love is a Mormon, so she probably won’t be doing any “wining,” or “beering” for that matter. (Maybe dropping out of school after the 8th grade wasn’t such a good idea for you after all.)

Second, her Democrat opponent *is* a white, male Mormon. So, again, please return in November to gloat over how every single election analyst was wrong and only you know “the way it is.” This isn’t complicated: the Democrat Owens is white, male and a Mormon, and Mia Love is a black female (and a Mormon); those are facts. So, by the immutable laws of Mormon voting that you have discovered, Owens surely will win. You shouldn’t be using weasel words such as “if her opponent is a white man (sic) Mormon (sic)” then Love will lose; just state your electoral prediction based solely on Mia Love’s sex and race (because that’s “the way it is”), and be man enough to return in November.

(Why “the way it is” didn’t apply when Love trounced her white, male, Mormon opponents in the GOP conventions in 2012 and 2014, and why the LDS church that dictates how Mormons must vote decided to tell 49% of them to vote for Matheson and another 49% of them to vote for Love, just to ensure a 0.3% margin of victory, is beyond me, but then again I’m not as knowledgeable about electoral MoRmOnIsM as you are.)


190 posted on 04/29/2014 8:08:22 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson