Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

At least some of the judiciary is refusing to be a rubber stamp to the JBT's.
1 posted on 04/24/2014 5:12:21 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Second Amendment First

I had an officer tell me that the constitution was a 200 year old piece of paper that got in the way of him doing his job.


2 posted on 04/24/2014 5:22:44 PM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
This rising assertiveness by magistrate judges — the worker bees of the federal court system — has produced rulings that elate civil libertarians and frustrate investigators, forcing them to meet or challenge tighter rules for collecting electronic evidence.

You mean they are going to have to present "probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"? Good. As much as I like to see criminals arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned forever, I only like it when the Constitution is followed verbatim.

4 posted on 04/24/2014 5:32:58 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
"...balking at sweeping requests by law enforcement officials for cellphone and other sensitive personal data" for their corrupt, local boss constituents. Yeah, that's right, folks. If a local bigwig wants some of your private information, that's how it works. There are properties to grab and big money to be made with such knowledge, and timing is everything. For example, who in your community can afford to pay an expensive attorney right now?


5 posted on 04/24/2014 5:33:44 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Magistrates don’t have to be approved by the politicians.


7 posted on 04/24/2014 5:42:37 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Outstanding!!


9 posted on 04/24/2014 6:03:59 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Good, very good.


10 posted on 04/24/2014 6:37:02 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

The States are building “fusion centers”, in some cases outside the state boarder. These databases will be linked to federal databases. It’s not hard to imagine some unspoken “temporary data exchanges” being set up, where data can be exchanged with very limited access (two individuals) and subsequently deleted by either.

There was a story locally about a prison guard accessing medical records of a free civilian. Seems the prison guard had a pitbull, because how could you be cool without one, and this pitbull bit a 12 year old on his street. A lawsuit was a very a distinct possibility. The prison has a single officer with access to local hospital records, so they can confirm the prisoner’s claims about their medical conditions. The guards conspired to access the 12 year olds private records. => The point being, if something can be abused it WILL be abused.


11 posted on 04/24/2014 7:03:58 PM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

This is very good news.

“In the United States federal courts, magistrate judges are appointed to assist United States district court judges in the performance of their duties.

“While district judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate for lifetime tenure, magistrate judges are appointed by a majority vote of the federal district judges of a particular district and serve terms of eight years if full-time, or four years if part-time, and may be reappointed.

“As of March 2009 there are 517 full-time and 42 part-time authorized magistrate judgeships, as well as one position combining magistrate judge and clerk of court.

“Magistrate judges generally oversee first appearances of criminal defendants, set bail, and conduct other administrative duties. The authority that a magistrate judge exercises is the jurisdiction of the district court itself, delegated to the magistrate judge by the district judges of the court under governing statutory authority and local rules of court.”


15 posted on 04/24/2014 7:58:14 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson