Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle
“This can only serve to hurt the blue states. It could end up costing them an election.”

My prediction is this: If it appears that it will cost them an election, they will renege on the compact.

In 2000, I believe that G.W. Bush would have won handily if they had followed this rule. I think Nixon would have won over Kennedy, Obama might even have lost in 2012.

I bet there is some fine print, such as, “The compact only goes into effect once all states sign on” or some such.

16 posted on 04/24/2014 11:47:04 AM PDT by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

I should read before commenting. The rule is clearly there, as they award the votes to the person getting the popular vote *nationally*, not by state.


18 posted on 04/24/2014 11:50:07 AM PDT by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 and Obama won the popular vote in 2012. How would a law requiring states whose EV’s totaled at least 270 to vote for the popular vote winner throw an election to the loser of that popular vote?


19 posted on 04/24/2014 11:50:31 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
"My prediction is this: If it appears that it will cost them an election, they will renege on the compact."

I think you are correct.

31 posted on 04/24/2014 3:18:32 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson