[JRandomFreeper]

The court that ruled against him wasn't an 'Oklahoma Court'.

It was a Federal Court that happened to be in Oklahoma.

/johnny

[greeneyes]

That I get. How a dispute between 2 private parties wound up with land going to neither party, but to the BLM makes no sense to me.

Also, the disputed land had to be in either Oklahoma or Texas, so why would the feral court have jurisdiction to begin with?

I have been searching for a link to the case and legal justification, but haven’t found it yet.

[ladybear]

I Live Here and Johnny is spot on. The owners were given NO, I repeat NO, notification of the open(?) meeting(s) by the BLM. We knew something was going on when BLM showed up sometime back and started surveying. They said it had been awhile since a survey had been done and they were just updating the survey. We started waiting for the next shoe to drop. Then comes the BLM report. It states they have been approached by horse riding clubs wanting access to riding trails on the Red River and others wanting access (for hunting, etc). I have neighbors who inherited land from their fathers, grandfathers, and great grandfathers. Land they were literally born on. We are SCARED, very SCARED. Our congressman seemed to give us no support. Thank GOD for Atty Gen Abbott and for other Patriotic Americans who are supporting & standing with us.