He also said the BLM didn't even want the land, and was not prepared to administrate it. They asked him to file some sort of paperwork, so that they wouldn't have to mess with it, but he refused.
How could an Oklahoma court take a Texan’s land? If the dispute was between to private individuals, why would the land be awarded to the BLM?
Why does the BLM claim rights to half the river? Does anyone have any links or knowledge regarding what really happened here? I just can't make head nor tails.
One thing I am sure of, the BLM is lying about not being interested in taking the thousands of acres, and the water that no doubt they are just itching to control.
/johnny