Underage drinking (I use the term in a legal-threshold sense, not a judgmental one) is more widespread and far more voluminous than anyone’s ‘beer blast’ of the 1970s could imagine.
I hesitate to use the term binge drinking because it’s one of those Silly Putty phrases used by lefties, including college administrators, to justify surveillance and draconian punishments.
The most effective way to combat underage drinking is to lower the drinking age to 18 (or possibly 19) again.
Simple? Silly? Self-evident? Perhaps. But it will work.
All of the bluster about alcohol (binge drinking etc.) ignores one fact: for 3/4 of an undergraduate population alcohol is forbidden fruit due to the 21 age restriction. Yes some bars will allow 18-and-up in and we all know that (wink wink) these 18+ customers MIGHT have a tipple or two.’
But prohibition and an arbitrary age limit simply increase demand. In the case of college students the demand and the prohibition set up a challenge, a game to be won at all costs. Consumption of alcohol in moderation is, or was, a rite of passage into adulthood. Social drinking is called that for a reason. When alcohol becomes contraband then access to that contraband can become an obsession. When the object of the obsession is obtained the next logical (?) step is to go absolutely hog-wild. Overconsumption becomes the norm because in the back of the mind of every underage drinker is “when and where will I have access to alcohol again?”
The 21 drinking age has failed on two fronts: it has failed to prevent or even reduce consumption; indeed, it has increased it in many cases. Worse, it has created hundreds if not thousands of unsupervised speakeasies in the form of dorm rooms, apartments, off-campus houses, etc. where social drinking i.e. a public display of being able to consume and still function as a rational human being is nowhere to be found. Instead, interaction is limited to drinking-oriented games (e.g. beer pong) and constant exhortations to consume stupor-inducing quantities of alcohol (beer bongs, shots, etc.).
In sum, the 21 drinking age is an overreach that stands the process of socialization on its head and forces students who choose to drink into a state of arrested development. They remain children but they are children with easy access to oceans of beer and spirits rather than young adults who frequent licensed venues in order to drink, yes, but also to (hopefully) continue the process of maturation via interaction.
So true.
There's no doubt that under-21 prohibition is a huge contributing factor to the many drunken riots that break out in college towns after a major sports team victory (or loss): "let's pound it down before the fuzz get here".
At least among high school students, it appears today's students drink far less than the high-schoolers in my area did in the 1980s.
Alcohol is far more difficult to purchase & bars are much more strict.
A lot of high-schoolers have pivoted to marijuana as a result.
What hurt me was when both of my kids confessed that it was easier for them to get weed, crack, or meth than beer. When they did get their hands on alcohol, they tended to binge drink.
They had to learn moderation later.
This is the trend with our kids. Rather than being taught that a glass or two of wine is fine with dinner, they chug it down as quickly as possible to avoid the law.
Strangely, the drug dealers don’t seem to care if they’re selling to minors. But the owners of liquor stores do.