Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin

Yeah, and they would “allow” Bundy to graze a certain number of cows per acre for a fee. But the number was totally insufficient to sustain his ranch. And that was the entire purpose of the feds. To run him out of business and off the land just as they did all the other large ranchers in the territory. It’s tyranny.


38 posted on 04/22/2014 12:21:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
Bundy doesn't really own a ranch. He owns some land that his family homesteaded, but he can't raise but a few cows on that land.

But he, and those before him, had the large grazing lease that he could graze large numbers of cattle on. That's the way Congress set it up way back when.

But Congress changed it in 1976 with FLPMA, and the Sagebrush Rebellion coincides with FLPMA.

43 posted on 04/22/2014 12:36:54 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Faux conservative journalist at Reuters attacks Bundy:

COLUMN-The Cliven Bundy in all of us
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/22/salam-bundy-idUSL2N0NE13L20140422


68 posted on 04/22/2014 2:16:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson