“The fact is, poor people sucking on the government teat are also sucking on cigarettes. Clearly they have disposable income to spend on cigarettes...the rhetorical question is why aren’t they putting those dollars to use on housing?”
That he is fine with the government micromanaging how one spends their money.
If not smokes, then maybe mandated vitamins, or fruits and veggies, no meat, no sugar, no cigs, no beer.
He’s Bloomberg.
Hardly. If you can afford to buy cigs while using my tax dollars to subsidize your living quarters, then you don't need as many of my tax dollars to subsidize your living quarters.