Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
Article II § 1: "Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors . . ."

NPV is horrible, and constitutional.

With NPV and a couple of Scotus appointments, the rats won't have to worry about suspending elections in order to remain in power. They won't even have to shutdown debate, intimidate conservatives into silence, or sic the IRS, and FBI on their enemies.

Thanks in part to no opposition from the GOP, our descent into police state hell is happening within the limits of our Frankenstein Constitution, and is perfectly legal.

What I don't understand is the trust so many Freepers have in the GOP wing of the Uniparty. If the GOP can't share in power, they will happily settle for wealth. In fact, they probably prefer it that way.

4 posted on 04/20/2014 2:38:23 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Obama has established executive branch precedents that no election can reverse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

The language in the article posted is too soft. It’s not an end run, it’s not a circumvention, it’s flat out breach and the GOP better start working on prior restraint, and Congress ought to warn the states that the election will be decertified in an event such an attempt happens.

My guess is they want to get this in place before Obama’s final term ends so that when the Constitutional Crises manifests itself he’ll take action on the side he supports. We know what side that will be.

It’s going to make a great debate question during the election cycle, just start putting the questions to candidates. Will you or will you not support such a breach?

After that, there is nothing to stop the offended states from seceding, except military action. I.E another Civil War.


5 posted on 04/20/2014 3:03:38 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie
Article II § 1: "Each state shall ....

Article I § 10: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State..."

12 posted on 04/20/2014 5:05:28 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
13 posted on 04/20/2014 5:14:51 AM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Jacquerie

Got this message this morning from COS:
“Alaska has passed HJR22 “The Convention of States Project Resolution” with no Amendments by a vote of 12 Yea and 8 Nay.


14 posted on 04/20/2014 5:20:01 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson