Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
liberals are correct in that the Constitution – not just arguably, but clearly – authorizes permanent property ownership outside the Enclave Clause.

Which constitution?

The one that means what it says?

Or the one that means what liberal judges say it means?


10 posted on 04/16/2014 3:35:47 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The future ain't what it use to be -- Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Iron Munro

Your “which Constitution” question is the root of the matter. And it’s not the “liberal judges” that are the problem, it’s the 14th Amendment incorporation without open acknowledgement that is the problem. It’s the application of perfectly legal corporate law in a wrongful way - i.e. against NON-corporate people and businesses.


30 posted on 04/16/2014 4:18:07 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson