Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner
How did the pro-Russian side get labeled as “separatist”? They don't want their own nation, they don't even want the nation they have. They want to join a hostile nation that is on their borders. Would not “traitor” be a more apt label?
4 posted on 04/16/2014 2:04:21 PM PDT by logic101.net (How many more children must die on the altar of gun control?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logic101.net
They want to join a hostile nation that is on their borders. Would not “traitor” be a more apt label?

Your question indicates that you don't really grasp the situation.

There were two offers of financial aid sitting in front of the Ukraine several months ago, a very good offer from Russia, and a very bad offer from the IMF. Yanukovich, the legitimate and elected president of the Ukraine, sensibly took the Russian offer, and Soros and a bunch of Soros-related organizations backed by our own rogue/feral state department pounced, and some of the Nazis in those organizations killed dozens of their own people in a false-flag op and seized power.

Not supporting that stupid **** does not make anybody a "traitor(TM)".

8 posted on 04/16/2014 2:24:05 PM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: logic101.net
Would not “traitor” be a more apt label?

Depends. Some use "oppressed Russian minority," and yammer about George Soros.

16 posted on 04/16/2014 2:39:32 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson