Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Better women than gays.
1 posted on 04/13/2014 5:36:52 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: RoosterRedux

I know some Crossfit level women who can more than withstand the rigors of Quantico.


2 posted on 04/13/2014 5:37:39 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

They’re gonna cook hot meals for our boys?

Awesome...


4 posted on 04/13/2014 5:39:20 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Good luck.

We’re f^ck’t with a ‘T’.


5 posted on 04/13/2014 5:41:12 PM PDT by x1stcav ("The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

no. neither are a good thing.


6 posted on 04/13/2014 5:42:02 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
conducting a study to test just how fit a soldier has to be to engage in combat

Are these people series?

THE FITTER THE FRIGGING BETTER!

7 posted on 04/13/2014 5:43:11 PM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Camo nail polish?


8 posted on 04/13/2014 5:44:40 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Let them try again. If they washed out on the FIRST day, there is little chance that they will make it through the entire course.


9 posted on 04/13/2014 5:45:05 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
The Army is conducting a study to test just how fit a soldier has to be to engage in combat.

Let's see, what will the study find, that we need higher standards, the same standard we use, or that we can get by with a lower standard.

12 posted on 04/13/2014 5:49:42 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

I wonder why there is no push to put women in the NFL or MLB? Is it because there are physical differences?


13 posted on 04/13/2014 5:50:25 PM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

I thought they said the standards weren’t going to be lowered?


15 posted on 04/13/2014 5:52:02 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

The Taliban are waiting. It won’t be pretty.


19 posted on 04/13/2014 5:55:37 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Will Gunny R. Lee Ermey be preparing the gyrls?


20 posted on 04/13/2014 5:55:50 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Good if they’re going to be fighting Americans. Bad if they’re going to be fighting America’s enemies.


22 posted on 04/13/2014 5:56:22 PM PDT by Old Yeller (In Latin, the word sinister means left. Which is appropriate for left-wingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Israel tried it years ago and found that having women in combat units reduced unit effectiveness by as high as 40%.


24 posted on 04/13/2014 5:57:33 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Did Santangelo not train prior????


28 posted on 04/13/2014 5:57:50 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

There are women who could serve in combat infantry roles and succeed, but thats no reason to open direct combat roles to women. It’s not sexist, its math. I know there are women who could do serve in infantry units so and some who would even thrive. That is not the problem, the problem is that what an average 18 year old male can do, you need to locate a female in top 95th physical percentile. Finding females who are likely candidates for a college scholarship in sports and the fast track for success in life that they should skip college and instead live in the mud for months at a time for a social experiment is even harder.

What you end up with for willing candidates is a handful of college grad marathon runners who would like to punch their social justice ticket to say they did it for womenkind. They may make it through qualification courses, maybe even a deployment in carefully choreographed scenarios with a token number of outside the wire incidents to make everything look legit. Mor likely than not, this type of woman has no intention of living the life for an entire career, like John Kerry, they will get medals and get out, then turn on everyone who was stupid enough to trust them in order to build a political career.


39 posted on 04/13/2014 6:10:20 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
The only women who should be placed in the vicinity of combat are physicians and nurses.This,along with perverts being allowed to serve....*CELEBRATED*,in fact...is a signal to our enemies,delivered clearly and deliberately by our Community Organizer-in-Chief,that we're too strong,that we've been the world's bully for too long and,to remedy this,he's taken steps to weaken our Armed Forces.

This worthless piece of excrement doesn't even bother to *try* to hide his contempt for our Armed Forces.

45 posted on 04/13/2014 6:35:54 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


63 posted on 04/13/2014 7:04:20 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
The military is taking steps to prepare women for combat roles in 2016.

At first, I thought it said they were preparing women to shoot American civilians.

85 posted on 04/13/2014 7:21:04 PM PDT by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
"The Marine Corps announced that it would give young female lieutenants who wash out of the grueling Infantry Officer Course a second shot, same as their male counterparts."

Training costs money. They don't just drop people on a whim. I don't know their exact procedures for granting a reevaluation ( second shot ) but I'm pretty sure the trainers had to cover themselves to ten decimal places when deciding not to allow the women another go. Not everyone who wants another chance gets it.

I'm also sure that word may have come down from on high that they didn't want to interfere with their decisions, but if it came down to a flip a coin situation where a woman may or may not get another chance, flip it her favor.

91 posted on 04/13/2014 7:31:42 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson