To: SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; Alia; altura; ...
2 posted on
04/10/2014 12:53:12 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Is that going to apply to GM fart-free cows as well?
3 posted on
04/10/2014 12:53:41 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Yeah? When are we going to get Country Of Origin Labeling?
4 posted on
04/10/2014 12:55:11 PM PDT by
null and void
(The British declared war on the Tea Party. The Tea Party won! (Thanks mom!))
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
so just label it.
they used to say x-rays were 100% safe too. Even put them in shoe stores.
used to say lead paint was safe.
coal dust in oreo cookies...
5 posted on
04/10/2014 12:57:50 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In other words, establish a convenient one-stop shopping center for bribery and corruption.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Good. Any state that wants to force it’s own labeling system is going to find that they have fewer choices that cost more on their store shelves.
7 posted on
04/10/2014 1:06:07 PM PDT by
Valpal1
(If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
FDA rulings go to the highest bidder.
Ain't that right, Monsanto?
8 posted on
04/10/2014 1:06:14 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In other words give _more_ authority to the bureaucrats who already have too much. We're is my USG representation in all of this?
For food: GMO should be labeled, country of origin should be labeled. Congress should require it, not had it to agencies. There are too many agencies and agents creating rules with the effect of law.
9 posted on
04/10/2014 1:08:23 PM PDT by
veracious
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If, CA, NY or TX passes a law requiring labeling, you can bet the whole country will have labeled food.
As we should.
Folks need to be able to choose based on the origin of their food.
10 posted on
04/10/2014 1:23:04 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
No, instead of giving the FDA a choice, they should mandate all GMO foods to be labeled.
11 posted on
04/10/2014 1:25:23 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Bill O’Reilly, or some other Bill?
12 posted on
04/10/2014 1:35:09 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Help Control Politician Overpopulation - Spay or Neuter Your Senator or Congressman Today!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Just put the truth on labels. Consumers can sort it out.
Where grown.
Whether GMO or not.
Some people will care. Some will not. Give them the info.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This is about nonsense. The biggest health problem we're facing with respect to "modified" foods is with the modern strains of dwarf wheat - which contain many problematic proteins (largely responsible for the huge increase in celiac disease and other inflammatory autoimmune diseases), and which were created with processes that are not categorized as "genetic modification".
Seems to me that the states should be free to require GMO labeling, if they so choose. Most European nations do so, or ban GMO entirely, and they seem to be managing. The Feds should butt out.
But the underlying premise - that if it's not GMO, then it's not a "frankenfood", is false. Knowing that it's not GMO doesn't tell you that it's healthy.
14 posted on
04/10/2014 1:45:58 PM PDT by
jdege
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Meanwhile scientists are working on gene splicing for babies with 3 or more birth parents’ genetic history.
Can we tattoo the GMO babies as well?
Or is that sacred because homosexuals want “offspring”?
17 posted on
04/10/2014 2:21:13 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The labeling requirement is not neutral or purely informational — it is part of an agenda that promotes the view that there is something wrong with GMO foods.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I recall reading some study recently that the herbicide Glyphosate (or some such) accumulates in the tissues of animals that eat the grain/corn that was modified to withstand it.
24 posted on
04/10/2014 6:44:17 PM PDT by
Conflict
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Cows not exposed to GMOs through their feed had significantly lower levels of glyphosate in their urine than cows fed GMO-containing feed. In the latter group, high concentrations of glyphosate and its metabolites were also found in the cows’ intestines, livers, muscles, spleens and kidneys, demonstrating how the chemical progressively accumulates throughout the body.
Similar findings were observed in the hares, rabbits and humans exposed to GMOs. Conventional feeding protocols were found to produce much higher levels of glyphosate poisoning in humans than non-GM and organic feeding protocols.
25 posted on
04/10/2014 6:44:17 PM PDT by
Conflict
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson