Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Why?

There is a legitimate argument that the federal government has no business owning 80% of Nevada.

296 posted on 04/10/2014 5:57:16 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

The case law would seem to indicate that Congress was granted the power to act as it sees fit regarding these lands, and divestiture would be possible only by legislation.

Fascinating body of court decisions stretching back to
our treaties with Spain, France and Mexico govern land sovereignty, and I’ve wasted several hours looking at
court decisions.

I did find a nice article on the Property Clause of the Constitution on the Heritage website.

http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/4/essays/126/property-clause

Another essay:
http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/crsreports/crsdocuments/RL34267_12032007.pdf


301 posted on 04/10/2014 6:38:18 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson