Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfflier

The problem is the missing debris. I’ve posted prior that given the fact they’ve been searching in the wrong area for weeks due to reliance on the geeks from Inmarsat, there should (ironically) be debris washing up on beaches in Malaysia in the next week or so.

If it broke up, there is floating debris (AF447 produced a debris field several miles long after just a few days); they’ve just been looking in all the wrong places...if it went in controlled, it was daylight and a calm ocean could very well see an intact fuselage (which, if one theory is proved, would be exactly what one would want if he/they wanted to ‘prolong the pain’, i.e., the ‘mystery’...).


32 posted on 04/09/2014 3:33:41 PM PDT by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869
Two events come to mind: Ethiopian Airlines 767 landing after fuel exhaustion much the same scenario as we are discussing now.

This plane landed in a relatively smooth open ocean.

https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=A0SO80801UVTXU8AbedXNyoA?p=hijacked+airliner+water+landing&fr=yfp-t-901&fr2=piv-web

US Airways, Capt Sullenberger's landing, was a masterpiece but on a protected inland waterway.

I agree that debris will wash ashore traceable to the missing flight. That may include bodies and body parts.

33 posted on 04/09/2014 4:28:35 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson