Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IIntense
Is that the sole reason to decide that one life is more valuable than another? Suppose there are no other children. Seems like the decision would be based on emotion and not logic. Just wondering.

Depends on what you consider as the basis for determining value. I heard that if a child dies, the child is already with God and saved. If an adult, who has not been saved dies to save a child, the adult's soul is lost to God.

I attended Catholic schools as a child and it was taught that it might be better to save an adult vs. a child for the souls saving reasons. Don't know if it's doctrine or not. Sometimes hard to relate to possible Biblical Truths w/o getting tangled up in human fallibility and the arguments that go with it. I'd probably save the child.

8 posted on 04/06/2014 4:15:58 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: trebb
...if a child dies, the child is already with God and saved.

Some would say that an unbaptized child won't enter heaven. I have a problem believing that. And if a mother chooses to risk or give up her own life to allow her child to have a life, she has made the supreme sacrifice. Therefore, she may have paid the price for her sins and be immediately welcomed by God if she dies.

However it goes, it is a harrowing situation to face and fortunately most of us are spared this decision.

There is a 1963 movie called The Cardinal which deals with this very subject. I watched it years ago and I think I will try to find it and see it again.

10 posted on 04/06/2014 11:25:57 PM PDT by IIntense (WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson