Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oversight Committee Will Move to Hold Lerner in Contempt [here we go again]
National Review ^ | 4/3/2014 | Eliana Johnson

Posted on 04/03/2014 11:26:31 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross

The House Oversight Committee will vote next Thursday on whether to hold former Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress, sources say.

A committee aide tells National Review Online the panel will “make an announcement on the contempt process for Lois Lerner sometime today,” and a GOP congressman confirms that committee chairman Darrell Issa has indicated the vote will take place “next week.”

Lerner has twice declined to answer questions from lawmakers about her role in the targeting of right-leaning groups. At a June hearing, the panel determined in a party-line vote that she had waived her Fifth Amendment rights by making an opening statement declaring her innocence when she appeared at hearing in May. “I have not done anything wrong,” Lerner said at the time. “I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”

When she again invoked the Fifth Amendment at a hearing last month, she opened the door to charges that she was obstructing the work of Congress.

The committee’s vote would clear the way for John Boehner to bring the issue before the full House, and he has indicated he will do so. Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said, “Speaker Boehner has been clear, both publicly and privately, that if Lois Lerner does not testify fully and truthfully, she will be found in contempt of Congress.”

Contempt findings are rare. If the House ultimately holds Lerner in contempt, a statute directs the district attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury. Criminal charges could result in a jail sentence between one month and one year or a fine between $100 and $1,000.

In a prelude to next week’s vote, the Committee last month released a 141-page report making its case that Lerner’s testimony is critical to its investigation and that she has obstructed the panel’s work by providing it with inaccurate information. The report says that without Lerner’s testimony, “The committee will never be able to fully understand the IRS’s actions. Lerner has unique, firsthand knowledge of how and why” the IRS decided to scrutinize conservative applicants for tax exemption.

The panel’s vote was temporarily pushed back, sources say, when Issa tangled with ranking committee member Elijah Cummings at the end of last month’s hearing, denying his request to make a statement and ordering committee aids to turn off his microphone. At the hearing, Lerner had for the second time refused to answer questions from the panel, but most of the media coverage focused on the fireworks between the two lawmakers, who have dueled for months now as Issa has pressed to continue investigating the IRS over Cummings’s vocal objections.

The two will undoubtedly spar at next week’s hearing. Cummings has already sent a letter to Boehner arguing that Issa violated key procedural rules that preclude the committee from holding Lerner in contempt. Issa shot back a letter to Cummings and on March 25 produced a memo from the House counsel indicating that the committee has met all the legal requirements to schedule a vote to issue a contempt citation.

UPDATE: Issa has announced the hearing, saying in a statement that “Ms. Lerner’s involvement in wrongdoing and refusal to meet her legal obligations has left the Committee with no alternative but to consider a contempt finding.”


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: contempt; issa; lerner; sameoldsameold
Since the standing Attorney General of the U.S. (i.e. the "top cop" of the land) continues in year two of being found "in contempt of Congress" without any detrimental personal effect at all, with all due respect, this means squat Congressman Issa.
1 posted on 04/03/2014 11:26:31 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

A “strongly worded” move, no doubt.


2 posted on 04/03/2014 11:28:15 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Agree it doesn’t mean much, but what else can he do? He is a committee chair in the house of representatives...


3 posted on 04/03/2014 11:28:34 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

Strict party line vote no doubt.


4 posted on 04/03/2014 11:30:37 AM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Reminds me of a sternly worded letter from Hans B(r)ix ....
5 posted on 04/03/2014 11:30:44 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

You know how Elija Cummings will vote!


6 posted on 04/03/2014 11:31:20 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

ALL CAPS, that should scare him.


7 posted on 04/03/2014 11:32:07 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Yeah, blah blah blah. I will be more interested if they do two things:

1. Hold her in contempt.

2. Hold her in jail.

8 posted on 04/03/2014 11:32:12 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

The wheels of justice turn way too slow for my taste, but if we can get it going in the direction of a Grand Jury hearing then we would be getting much closer to the ultimate goal.


9 posted on 04/03/2014 11:32:31 AM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
A “strongly worded” move, no doubt.

"You kids behave up there or do yo want me to send Daddy up"?.

Krap from the Kongress Kitters again. What a bunch of gutless people.

10 posted on 04/03/2014 11:35:15 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
There once was a women named Lerner
Who’s demeanor couldn’t be sterner
So Issa got bent
And gave her contempt
Saying that will most surely learn her.
11 posted on 04/03/2014 11:36:30 AM PDT by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Let him do it anyway. It’s not Issa’s fault that the law has no teeth - or that it is supposed to be enforced by the very same person who has been found in contempt.

That’s the big problem. As long as Holder is in charge of the Justice Dept. - and obviously, being found in contempt means nothing to the Executive branch and Senate Dem majority and is probably even a resume enhancer - probably very little will happen. But it’s got to be done anyway.


12 posted on 04/03/2014 11:36:51 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Am I alone in thinking besides Ms. Lerner, there are possibly three people who should be charged with perjury? Why do ‘they’ refuse to call Leon Panetta to testify...Mr. Chaffetz wouldn’t even mention his name....Leon Panetta is ‘key’ to the Benghazi investigation.


13 posted on 04/03/2014 11:42:12 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

War on Women Alert!


14 posted on 04/03/2014 11:54:37 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Panetta sure resigned quickly in the wake of Benghazi didn't he?

He's probably the one who came up with the video lie.

15 posted on 04/03/2014 12:02:32 PM PDT by what's up (su)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
I believe the executive privilege claimed by Obama/Holder is still in the courts is it not?
16 posted on 04/03/2014 12:03:59 PM PDT by what's up (su)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

The wheels of justice grind slowly, especially when it involves Obama.


17 posted on 04/03/2014 1:12:05 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

18 posted on 04/03/2014 1:12:50 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson