To: Fester Chugabrew
It pretty much is bribery - but it seems most people miss the real problem. As long as the government is going to legislate in all areas of life, people and organizations are going to have incentive to try and influence that legislation, through a variety of means (including contributions/bribes). If the government were to fit within their constitutionally prescribed role, this problem would be highly reduced - the incentive to contribute would no longer exist.
59 posted on
04/02/2014 10:44:53 AM PDT by
utford
To: utford
It pretty much is bribery - but it seems most people miss the real problem. As long as the government is going to legislate in all areas of life, people and organizations are going to have incentive to try and influence that legislation, through a variety of means (including contributions/bribes). If the government were to fit within their constitutionally prescribed role, this problem would be highly reduced - the incentive to contribute would no longer exist.Very true. The founders thought that the powers granted to the federal government they created were so effectively circumscribed by the Constitution that it wouldn't't really matter very much who won federal elections.
73 posted on
04/02/2014 1:26:51 PM PDT by
Spartan79
(I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health, and the liberties of man. Jefferson)
To: utford
75 posted on
04/02/2014 3:58:24 PM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
To: utford
While true enough, who could be elected to “reduce” the size of government? The money is always going to be on the big government side.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson