[C. Edmund Wright]

I was answering your question (yes, I speak in context, you bounce all over the place like a spoiled child with arrested logical development) - not speaking about who I am or threatening anything. Your ability to follow a conversation, in context of what YOU have said earlier, is shamefully lacking.

[Resettozero]

I was answering your question (yes, I speak in context, you bounce all over the place like a spoiled child with arrested logical development) - not speaking about who I am or threatening anything. Your ability to follow a conversation, in context of what YOU have said earlier, is shamefully lacking.

Poppycock. Unadulterated.

So, what do you anticipate taking away from this exchange?

[Resettozero]

Your ability to follow a conversation, in context of what YOU have said earlier, is shamefully lacking.

My ability to follow a meaningful conversation is doing just fine. Your idea of a "conversation", on this thread anyway, demonstrably is for you to harangue those who disagree with you, even behind their backs, until you've provoked someone to call you out on your accusatory malarkey.

What is it you think you are achieving?