I would only protest at their workplaces IMO. Its a slippery slope if you invade their privacy at their homes because the knee-jerk reaction by politicians will be to pass legislation that keeps their home addresses out of official record and instead turn them into even “more” of a protected class. I have two legislation passed twice to protect them in instances where they were scrutinized by the public where it was considered an overreach. Its important to maintain our own integrity in the process.
I would only protest at their workplaces IMO. Its a slippery slope if you invade their privacy at their homes because the knee-jerk reaction by politicians will be to pass legislation that keeps their home addresses out of official record and instead turn them into even “more” of a protected class. I have seen two items of legislation passed twicein order to protect them in instances where they were scrutinized by the public where it was considered an overreach. Its important to maintain our own integrity in the process.
“Its a slippery slope if you invade their privacy at their homes because the knee-jerk reaction by politicians will be to pass legislation that keeps their home addresses out of official record and instead turn them into even “more” of a protected class. “
Here in California all LEOs (and their immediate families) automobile registrations are kept secret. This number includes all non-sworn members of law enforcement like dispatchers and secretaries. Even the white hats at the airports. Result, a white hat at LAX was able to run up a five figure tab with his FasTrak transponder and never get caught until the Orange County Register did and expose on toll violators which showed that LEOs were at the top of the list by a wide margin.