“BUT WHAT ABOUT A DESCRIPTION OF THE PERPETRATORS????
I might be able to hazard a guess as to the reason for that, but I’m not going to put it in writing.”
Why is it that they never mention that the Perps are NEGROES? If they were white, Asian, etc., it would be MENTIONED, so therefore we have to ASSUME they are BLACK. Could POLITAL CORRECTNESS be the answer?
The rule of thumb from the handbook of journalist rules (it’s a given that it’s leftist) is that if the race of a perp isn’t mentioned,usually in bold and underlined, that the perp was black. Also, statistically, it’s more than likely to have been black perps (I learmed on a cop blog that cops, at least Chicago ones, never say “perp”, but I’m neither a cop nor from Chicago, so I’ll keep using it as it’s shorter to type. I don’t why they don’t use it-at the cop blog, I noticed they mostly say “sh*theads” but that couldn’t be the official terminology. Or maybe in Chicago, it is.)
Finally found a paper that showed a little nerve.