To: SoConPubbie
“Otherwise, his protestations not withstanding, his so-called Tea-Party credentials don’t mean squat.”
I think Paul’s playing a very shrewd game. I think he’s got his eye on the presidency and is doing what needs to be done. With him as the executive, he can (and I believe will) turn back a lot of this stuff. And if we can all vote for McCain and Romney, we can all certainly vote for Paul.
7 posted on
03/28/2014 2:11:34 PM PDT by
cotton1706
(ThisRepublic.net)
To: cotton1706
I think Pauls playing a very shrewd game. I think hes got his eye on the presidency and is doing what needs to be done. With him as the executive, he can (and I believe will) turn back a lot of this stuff. And if we can all vote for McCain and Romney, we can all certainly vote for Paul.
I don't think he is shrewd at all.
He's pandering to voting blocks vs. standing on principle.
He is selling out to the GOP-E on policies important to conservatives though:
1. His own Amnesty plan.
2. Putting Social issues on the back-burner.
3. Extremely weak on Foreign Policy
4. Supporting a horrible GOP-E candidate in McConnell over a up and coming principle tea-party candidate in Matt Bevin.
Sorry, those aren't actions of a "shrewd" statesman, but the actions of a conniving Politician that will do almost anything to get elected.
With each passing month, he sounds and acts more like Mitt Romney.
And, BTW, though I voted for McCain because of Palin, I did not and will not vote for another sell-out like Mitt Romney.
Sadly, if Rand Paul continues on the trajectory he is on, there won't be a dime's worth of difference between him and Romney.
8 posted on
03/28/2014 2:16:39 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson