Posted on 03/27/2014 4:53:53 PM PDT by neverdem
I wonder if these hard core statists in Connecticut would institute a “Blogging Eligibility Certificate” requirement.
What does this mean?
They have no defense or immunity when passing Unconstitutional laws, they are subject to all manner of charges:
An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
Argued March 24-25, 1886
Decided May 10, 1886
118 U.S. 425
Murdock Vs Pennsylvania 319 USSCR 105
No state can convert a secured liberty (right) to a privilege and issue a license and fee for it
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
18 USC § 2382 - Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
18 USC § 2384 Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
What law?
While acts of a de facto incumbent of an office lawfully created by law and existing are often held to be binding from reasons of public policy, the acts of a person assuming to fill and perform the duties of an office which does not exist de jure can have no validity whatever in law.
An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.
Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) Argued March 24-25, 1886 Decided May 10, 1886 118 U.S. 425
NO! WE WILL NOT COMPLY.
We want them to enforce the AR-15 registration law, or repeal it.
Come and take them, you jack-booted thugs and your Obozo butt-kissing Governer Malloy.
Oh they are going to enforce it. But it will be selectively. Here is how I believe that they will go about it: They will have a list of those or most of those who haven't complied. As they go or return from their jobs or as they are traveling on the road doing other necessary or unnecessary things, they will become the targets of traffic stops. At that time, they will then be taken into custody or killed.
The State of CT ran into the same problem that the National Socialists ran into when they decided to exterminate the Jews. (1) They did not realize that there was so many of them. (2) They did not have the facilities to hold all of them until they could be exterminated.
Their [the national Socialists] solution? Grant exemptions until they had the facilities. In the case of the Jews, this did not happen until 1940 when they build their extermination facilities in Poland.
How thing in CT will shake out I can't say but I do know that until that law is repealed it is still alive. I also believe that the State is stalling for time until they can deal with the unexpected resistance.
I wish the gun owners success, but they should never forget that the State is treacherous .
This is registration, pure and smiple.
Great! I hope the majority holds together on this. I look for them to try and make an example out of a few to sway the many because they can't take you all on.
The only place that information sits is at the individual gun dealer's (background checks only state: long gun, hand gun, or other).
As soon as they access that info everyone in Konnecticut will know about it....
Bump for later reference
Like I was saying without saying it, the State is just getting all the information they need together. They [the State has a record of every gun that is sold in the State, the dealer the factory sold it to, the individual the dealer sold it to. From there, they can get to where they want to go. As long as they have the serial number, they can find what they want to know. And the old, “I lost my gun ____” did not work in Germany and it won’t work here. The only thing it got them [the gun owner] was imprisoned or killed. It will be the same thing here.
Done.
I lost all mine in a terrible canoeing accident years ago.
Hogwash, the NRA is capitulating and taking the lesser of 2 evils,(which still gives you evil) and selling your, mine & everyone's "Rights down the river"
Now with all the money they take in if they would try filing treason charges against these odious traitors.... I might consider supporting them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.