Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hoodat

Well, yes. It used to be that idiot Presidents had knowledgeable advisors to brief them. But Obama hasn’t appointed any knowledgeable advisors in any branch of government. Not one.

But, as Hillary would say, “What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?”


4 posted on 03/27/2014 9:47:37 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
Indeed!

This President is a disgrace and an embarrassment to the country. How could one make such an incredibly stupid error? Arrogance. Most people who know nothing about Kosovo would refrain from lecturing about it in public, you'd think.

9 posted on 03/27/2014 9:53:19 AM PDT by 88keys (broken glass GOP; it matters, replace the Dems. 2014!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
Well, yes. It used to be that idiot Presidents had knowledgeable advisors to brief them. But Obama hasn’t appointed any knowledgeable advisors in any branch of government. Not one.

We don't know that with absolute certainty; in fact we don't know who all of his advisors are. A name pops up occasionally, and no one has a clue whether it an "official" (paid) position" or a shadow figure lurking in the background or under rocks.

What are the legal rules? Is a President obligated to divulge all his official and unofficial advisors? Is there such a list? Observers and concerned groups may or may not have compiled an ongoing list of that "shadow presidency." Aren't citizens of the Republic entitled to know who they are?
Is there an official or unofficial accounting available of who they all are?

To this day, I have no clue what individuals wrote Obamacare, the ACA Act. I just know with certainty that the elected officials with the power to create laws are just as clueless as I am. They have admitted as much, they couldn't be bothered to read it before they "passed it. The same with the additional 30,000 pages of "clarifying" rules and regulations.

An activist "community organizer," without an ounce of experience in the free exchange, private enterprise system, a real world executive position, zero knowledge and experience of the Constitutional ( beyond the tools with which to exploit it for the benefit of the indolent) or in world foreign policy and affairs, economics, science, math or any other useful knowledge somehow got elected president. Twice.

But, as Hillary would say, “What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?”

All the difference in the world. How, otherwise can We the People fight the damned cultural cancer?

Let's get that list going. Who actually runs this country?

33 posted on 03/27/2014 10:59:52 AM PDT by publius911 ( At least Nixon had the good g race to resign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

Obama thinks he can lie to the world the same as he does to US citizens.

The truth should be told no matter how it shakes out for your own interests. The O admin is adverse to the truth.

No harm can be done that can’t be worked out with the truth, but much harm comes from lying.


34 posted on 03/27/2014 11:01:35 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson