Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
This situation makes more sense once you understand that bishops in the U.S. are effectively political office-holders, not religious leaders. This is why they are as feckless and useless as your typical member of Congress when it comes to governance.

Anyone who looks to a bishop for leadership is in for a lot of disappointment.

2 posted on 03/26/2014 4:30:53 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The political problem and service to oligarchy is at the center of all forms of organized religion. Organized religions are just that, organized.


3 posted on 03/26/2014 4:38:00 AM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Cardinal O’Malley of Boston was cornered a few years ago, and asked about Denial of Communion for pro-abortion politicians.

EVERYTHING he had to say about it was political. He said that the bishops’ conference had to be united. Nonsense. He said that the bishops must avoid, at all costs, appearing to be picking on one political party! Nonsense!

What he NEVER did was address the REAL question: Is giving Communion to pro-abortion politicians a SIN?

That is the ONLY question any bishop really needs to answer. And the answer is YES.

Antinomianism is a moral disease, with which all but about a dozen American bishops are infected. All the others consider the wearing of red or purple to place them above the moral law, divine law, and canon law.


6 posted on 03/26/2014 9:17:06 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson