Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema

There shouldn’t be anything in that government healthcare mandate related to contraception and/or killing babies.


8 posted on 03/26/2014 4:26:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

There should never have been anything in “insurance” regarding sex at all for all these years, unless it actually is a necessity for health/medical reasons.

Abortion, birth control, men’s sexual enhancement (why is it never for women, who have more trouble anyway?) - NONE of these is a medical issue.

All of them are for convenience and have nothing to do with maintaining the life of the subject.

Yet, guess what I could get tax-free? Both off the shelf, and prescription? You guessed it - I can get sex stuff without penalty. No co-pay on BC pills. Simple condoms with no tax! Meanwhile, my chronic necessities - colon and reflux troubles, embolism - I have to pay for these including tax! Unbelievable! (Yes, I have stated my displeasure and shock anytime that happened.)

They truly are moving us toward Idiocracy (TM). Intentionally.


34 posted on 03/26/2014 12:57:31 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson