Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian

As I read it he made the decision because CT DCF wouldn’t take custody of her and he doesn’t want to return her to the parents. They mention parental abuse but if that were the case CT DCF would take their other children.

This is a MA DCF vs CT DCF issue. They are killing her over a bureaucratic bottleneck and paper pushers.


109 posted on 03/26/2014 12:10:21 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
As I read it he made the decision because CT DCF wouldn’t take custody of her and he doesn’t want to return her to the parents.

According to the opinion, CT DCF wanted to take the child, and had a facility ready for her, but the parents threatened to sue that facility, so CT backed out.

111 posted on 03/26/2014 12:12:53 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson