Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Would America Go to War with Russia?
The National Interest ^ | March 24, 2014 | James S. Robbins

Posted on 03/24/2014 11:31:47 AM PDT by Abakumov

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: Abakumov; All

Polar Bear Expedition

North Russia Intervention

Polar Bear Expedition ·
Battle of Tulgas ·
Vaga River front (Battle of Ust-Padenga ·
Battle of Shenkursk ·
Battle of Vystavka)·
Battle of Bolshie Ozerki.

Polar Bear Monument in White Chapel Cemetery, Troy, Michigan, sculptor Leon Hermant.

Historical marker for Polar Bear Monument in White Chapel Cemetery, Troy, Michigan.

The Polar Bear Expedition (also known as the Northern Russian Expedition, the American North Russia Expeditionary Force - ANREF or the American Expeditionary Force North Russia - AEFNR) was a contingent of about 5,000 U.S. troops[1] that landed in Arkhangelsk, Russia as part of the Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War and fought the Red Army in the surrounding region during the period of September 1918 through July 1919.

Contents
1 Allied Intervention
2 Campaign
3 Withdrawal
4 Repatriation of the dead
5 Last living member dies
6 See also
7 References
8 Bibliography
9 External links

Allied Intervention

The Polar Bear Expedition was sent to Russia by the U.S. President Woodrow Wilson in response to requests from the governments of Great Britain and France to join the Allied Intervention in North Russia (also known as the North Russia Campaign). The British and French had three objectives for this intervention:

1.preventing Allied war material stockpiles in Archangelsk (originally intended for the recently collapsed Eastern Front) from falling into German or Bolshevik hands
2.mounting an offensive to rescue the Czech Legion, which was stranded along the Trans-Siberian Railroad and
3.resurrecting the Eastern Front by defeating the Red Army with the assistance of the Czech Legion and an expanded anti-Bolshevik force drawn from the local citizenry - and in the process stopping the spread of communism and the Bolshevik cause in Russia.

On July 14, 1918, the U.S. Army’s 85th Division left their training camp at Camp Custer, Michigan for the Western Front in France. Three days later, President Wilson agreed to a limited participation by American troops in the Allied Intervention with the stipulation that they would only be used for guarding the stockpiled war material. When U.S. Army General John J. Pershing received the directive from President Wilson, he changed the orders for the 339th Infantry Regiment, along with the First Battalion of the 310th Engineers plus a few other ancillary units from the 85th Division. Instead of heading for France, these units were trained and re-outfitted in England with Russian guns and then sent to North Russia, where they arrived in Arkhangelsk on September 4, 1918 and were placed under British command.

See American Expeditionary Force Siberia for information on the 7,950 American soldiers and officers who were sent to Vladivostok, Russia at the same time.

Campaign

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2013)

When the British commanders of the Allied Intervention arrived in Arkhangelsk on August 2, 1918, they discovered that the Allied war material had already been moved up the Dvina River by the retreating Bolshevik forces. Therefore, when the American troops arrived one month later, they were immediately used in offensive operations to aid in the rescue of the Czech Legion. The British commanders sent the First Battalion of the 339th Infantry up the Dvina River and the Third Battalion of the 339th up the Vologda Railroad where they engaged and pushed back the Bolshevik forces for the next six weeks.

However, these two fronts each became hundreds of miles (kilometers) long and were extremely narrow and difficult to supply, maintain, and protect. By the end of October 1918, they were no longer able to maintain the offensive and acknowledging their fragile situation and the rapid onset of winter, the Allies began to adopt a defensive posture.

The Allied commanders soon also came to the realization that they would not be able to raise an effective local force of anti-Bolshevik soldiers. Thus they gave up their goal of linking up with the Czech Legion and settled in to hold their gains over the coming winter. During that winter, the Bolshevik army went on the offensive, especially along the Vaga River portion of the Dvina River Front, where they inflicted numerous casualties and caused the Allies to retreat a considerable distance.

During their time in North Russia, the American forces suffered more than 210 casualties, including at least 110 deaths from battle, about 30 missing in action, and 70 deaths from disease, 90% of which were caused by the Spanish Flu.

Withdrawal

Following the Allied Armistice with Germany on November 11, 1918, family members and friends of the ANREF soldiers began writing letters to newspapers and circulating petitions to their representatives in the U.S. Congress asking for the immediate return of the ANREF from North Russia. In turn, the newspapers editorialized for their withdrawal and their Congressmen raised the issue in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile, aware of not only the change in their mission, but also of the Armistice on the Western Front and the fact that the port of Arkhangelsk was now frozen and closed to shipping, the morale of the American soldiers soon plummeted. They would ask their officers for the reason they were fighting Bolshevik soldiers in Russia and would not receive a specific answer other than they must fight to survive and avoid being pushed into the Arctic Ocean by the Bolshevik army.

Early in 1919, instances of rumored and actual mutinies in the Allied ranks became frequent. President Wilson directed his War Department on February 16, 1919 to begin planning the ANREF’s withdrawal from North Russia. In March 1919, four American soldiers in Company B of the 339th Infantry drew up a petition protesting their continued presence in Russia and were threatened with court-martial proceedings. U.S. Army Brigadier General Wilds P. Richardson arrived in Arkhangelsk aboard the icebreaker Canada on April 17, 1919, with orders from General Pershing to organize a coordinated withdrawal of the American troops “at the earliest possible moment”. On May 26, 1919, the first half of 8,000 volunteer members of the British North Russian Relief Force arrived in Arkhangelsk to relieve the American troops. In early June, the bulk of the ANREF sailed for Brest, France and then for New York City and home, which for two-thirds of them was in the state of Michigan. During the withdrawal, the men of the ANREF decided to call themselves “Polar Bears” and were authorized to wear the Polar Bear insignia on their left sleeve. The ANREF was officially disbanded on August 5, 1919.

Several years after the American troops were withdrawn from Russia, President Warren G. Harding called the expedition a mistake and blamed the previous administration.

Repatriation of the dead

After they returned home, the Polar Bear veterans lobbied their state and Federal governments to obtain funds and the necessary approvals to retrieve the bodies of more than 125 U.S. soldiers who were known to have been left behind in North Russia. Hampered by the lack of diplomatic recognition between the United States and the Soviet Union, it took many years before they finally received permission. An expedition under the auspices of the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) was successful in organizing and conducting a recovery mission in the autumn of 1929 that found, identified and brought out the remains of 86 U.S. soldiers. Another dozen remains of ANREF soldiers were shipped by the Soviet Union to the U.S. in 1934, which reduced the number of U.S soldiers still buried in North Russia to about 30.

The remains of 56 ANREF soldiers were eventually re-buried in plots surrounding the Polar Bear Monument by sculptor Leon Hermant in White Chapel Memorial Cemetery, Troy, Michigan in a ceremony on May 30, 1930.

Last living member dies.

Harold Gunnes, who was born in 1899, died on March 11, 2003. Gunnes was believed to have been the last living American to have fought in the Allied Intervention near the port of Arkhangelsk on the White Sea.


81 posted on 03/24/2014 1:15:46 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov
It has been said that the purpose of NATO is to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. I'm not sure those purposes still make sense to most Europeans. I don't think they make sense to Americans, either. Europe has more manpower and greater GDP than Russia. They really don't need us to defend themselves. If they refuse to defend themselves, why should we defend them?
82 posted on 03/24/2014 1:23:24 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semantic
And why would he do that? Why not simply play the long game

I SAID, IF he wants the demise of NATO to be explicit. I don't know that he wants that, he may find it useful to do as you suggest.

The big deal, the only deal that really matters, is with Germany. We do not know what the Germans are thinking, and we don't know what Putin has said to their (ex-GDR) chancellor.

83 posted on 03/24/2014 1:28:09 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

THIS


84 posted on 03/24/2014 1:46:38 PM PDT by gura (If Allah is so great, why does he need fat sexually confused fanboys to do his dirty work? -iowahawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I’m not convinced West will fight for Poland either. When Hitler and Stalin took Poland, they’ve done exactly nothing. (as in Phoney War, 1939-40)

Of course, then there’s Yalta Conference


85 posted on 03/24/2014 1:51:40 PM PDT by Ivan Mazepa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Abakumov

No. Nor should we unless there is a direct attack on us or a NATO member.


86 posted on 03/24/2014 1:57:50 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumpmaster
"Having the two non-muslim giants at war with each other is something bin Laden could only dream about."

Makes a lot of sense, instead of nonsense posted. Would add China to the dreamers.

87 posted on 03/24/2014 2:10:41 PM PDT by ex-snook (God forgives because God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

>The entire situation is Obama’s fault for seeming weak in the first place.<

.
Seeming weak?


88 posted on 03/24/2014 2:19:20 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dalberg-Acton

“I would hate to see America at war with this CIC....”

.
So would I.

Whose side would he be on?


89 posted on 03/24/2014 2:22:38 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The demise of Ukraine was also explicit - just like Serbia, Iraq, Libya, etc, before it.

However, each respective state was terminated via a different process. If Russia decided to do a reverse Ukraine on NATO, do you think anyone would not understand the *explicit* nature of the intrigue?

Seems like your comment was directed to the folks in the cheap seats ie the ones who need a lot of flash/boom in order to get the message. Trust me, with stakes this high, no one plotting the moves is confused as to what's actually transpiring.

90 posted on 03/24/2014 2:36:36 PM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

“Whose side would he be on?”

His?


91 posted on 03/24/2014 2:39:07 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Might happen—but not over Ukraine or even Poland.


92 posted on 03/24/2014 2:43:57 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Perhaps/probably not worth a PFC but what about a CIC?


93 posted on 03/24/2014 3:08:30 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: gdani
Well they live in the past, "We gotta get dem Rooskies!".

That was the eighties and this is 2014 with a bankrupt US.

What`s funny is how we`re bankrupt when O`Bozo spends money, yes we are! But when the military industrial complex is the spender, suddenly it`s "What 17 Trillion Dollars?", "I don`t see a 17 Trillion Dollar deficit!", or "Trillions, Shmillions, we`re good for it Fed!".

94 posted on 03/24/2014 3:23:06 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
You forgot the sarcasm tag.

Actually, I did not forget anything.

I said what I meant, and I meant what I said. Precisely.

95 posted on 03/24/2014 5:14:29 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson