Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian

So does the following hold up under current case law?

“Because the Fourth Amendment protects people, rather than places, its reach cannot turn on the presence or absence of a physical intrusion into any given enclosure.”


14 posted on 03/22/2014 5:50:27 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Yes, that’s the current law, per the Warren Court. One of those times when the “living Constitution” folks got it right and the “originalists” got it wrong.


15 posted on 03/22/2014 7:15:42 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson